no. it failed to succed because king Richard got captured and was held for ransom
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
It was somewhat of a failure.
The main difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is that the Christian forces successfully captured Jerusalem and surrounding lands in the First Crusade and experienced heavy losses in the Second Crusade. Both crusades were formed to reconquer Muslim lands that had been previously Christian and/or Jewish.
It was the Third Crusade
It was the Third Crusade
It was the Third Crusade
It was the Third Crusade
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
No in the second crusade.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
The second crusade was called in 1145 and ended in 1149. There is a link to an article on it below.
I tyink he answer to "who was the french leader of the second crusade" is Louis VII.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.