Rome was in trouble on 135 B.C because farmers lost their land, meaning Rome lost its economy. Merchants became very poor because luxuries were available in other places for rich Romans to buy, artisans lost their business because the Romans wanted to buy from Syria and Greece, and government officials were to busy getting money to worry about the republic's problems. The gap between the rich and the poor grew. The poor hated the rich and the rich hated the poor. Because of all this, Rome lost its political stability.
Rich Romans lived in their houses and slept in their beds.
The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.The patricians were originally the rich land owning class of Romans.
rich people could serve
IF they were rich they would live outside the citites.
Rich Romans lived in amazing houses poor Romans didn't. Rich Romans ate delectable food poor Romans didn't rich Romans had money poor ones didn't rich ones didn't work poor ones did but there is a difference between poor Romans and slaves were people who were very poor and were owned. and if you want to learn the difference between slaves and rich people or poor people and slaves i recommend going on to wikipedia it is a very advanced website that has about 20 A4 pages about every single precise subject.
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
rich Romans lived in big houses or beautiful palaces
Many Romans lived in fancy housing and had luxurious furniture while the poor had insulars[bad houses]. The rich Romans had awsome food and liked to show off.
No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.No, and neither did the rich Romans. The Romans did not use butter, they used oil in its place.
Palatine Hill
Since whatever the poor used must have been something that could not endure staying the same shape for years and years to come. And because when whoever took over the Romans they kept the good stuff ( Rich romans houses and mansions...) and destroyed the things they didn't need ( poor people things) Addition Look for books by Mary Beard on the excavations at Pompeii. For example the contents of the sewers can be examined to find what the rich and poor ate. She says the poor were surprisingly well fed.
The rich Romans did. The poor Romans who could not afford to throw parties ate their food from a sitting position.
Rich Romans wore a toga to outdoor events. They also had other stuff to wear.
Water and diluted wine were the main drinks of all Romans, both rich and poor.
Romans. Specifically Roman women. But some gay Roman men wore it too.
The poor in Rome lived off mainly bread and porridge. Prandium, which was a bit like lunch because it was eaten at 11 am-noon, was a light meal, quite like a snack. It was common to eat the leftovers from the supper (cena) of the day before.