When Michael Wood says it was a rejection of a whole way of understanding history, he likely means that a significant shift or change has occurred in the interpretation and analysis of historical events. This could involve challenging traditional narratives, questioning established beliefs, or introducing new perspectives that challenge previously accepted notions of history. It signifies a departure from conventional approaches to historical study and a willingness to explore alternative viewpoints and interpretations.
whole East India Company.
This is only my understanding but I would argue the reason he describes it as a dialogue is because 'history' is not a constant, despite the fact it is often represented to be static. Instead we constantly reanalyze history and events with the understanding of the present and draw different meanings.they are constantly re-negotated.We understand both the past and the present in conjunctur, you cannot isolate either one, they both have implications for each other. (in dialouge)Carr mentions something along the lines that judgments and actions are conditioned by the past. Because it is always there to provide a backdrop and context.Some theorists argue that the past/history is an illusion and its only function is to comment on the present. (Have a look at Tosh, J. and Lang, S.'s The Pursuit of History. and/or The History of ideas - By Preston King)and if you want to get really into the whole history is made up thing look at Jean Baudrillard who bascially says history is totally meaningless because we no longer know what the situation was like when the events took place so it is impossible to interpret them without that knowledge.hope this helps
the answer to this is simple. FEUDALISM. it is the word that defines medieval Europe as a whole and takes the meaning of feud to the next level. if you get this as an essay question just put that word. just that word. your history teacher will love it and give you and A-- it worked for me! haha... but really.
Norse is a word referring to the Scandinavian races.
It mostly depends on what region you are talking about, but as a whole the people were looking towards a stable government that helped them. In modern day terms, it was more liberatarian. For Europe, it was a time of revolutions and changing authorities. The people were looking for a government that lasted more than ten years. America's government was in the process of becoming federalistic, that is after the 70's. So to say libertarian would be a safe answer, if I am understanding your question.
Yes
Micheal Angelo was a famous painter and sculptor
Whole Lotta History was created in 2005.
Reductionism is the term for understanding the whole of an organism by its parts. It involves breaking down complex systems into simpler components to better understand how they function.
I would say Micheal Jackson before he died and before the whole children thing and all.
football history
Actually Micheal Jackson is the best, the nest is Usher third is Chris brown..
To determine rates a long list of questions would have to be answered. They would ask age, family history, medical history and anything else they feel would give them a better understanding of your health. Upon reviewing those answers then a quote would be given.
whole East India Company.
this is werid. At first look, it has no understanding. Can you please give the whole sentence?
because by passing different stages in life we are creating a history so whole life is an eventful and memorable history
The study of astronomy, astrophysics, and cosmology helps us understand the universe by exploring the origins, evolution, and structure of celestial objects and phenomena. By analyzing data from telescopes and experiments, scientists can uncover the laws of physics that govern the universe, leading to insights about its composition, history, and future. This research also sheds light on fundamental questions about the nature of space, time, and matter, deepening our understanding of the cosmos as a whole.