History is mainly fact, but opinions can be used for things which has no or unclear facts.
Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.Your question calls for an opinion, not a fact and opinions differ. Read the play "Julius Caesar" and form your own opinion.
The Roman empire was one of the most influential in history. A fact about the Romans is that they called London Londinium.
Caesar considers Antony a loyal friend despite the fact that Antony likes to stay out all night partying.
History is so imperfect because people believe in different things. Some people will think a person could be a hero and others list things that consider him a villain. People write their side of the story on how they saw it happened. History goes back to billions of years with the fact that people were not there when it happened we have to make predictions and find research to investigate how something possibly could have occurred. With predictions and research this could lead to little and/or false information that may or may not be true.
This is only my understanding but I would argue the reason he describes it as a dialogue is because 'history' is not a constant, despite the fact it is often represented to be static. Instead we constantly reanalyze history and events with the understanding of the present and draw different meanings.they are constantly re-negotated.We understand both the past and the present in conjunctur, you cannot isolate either one, they both have implications for each other. (in dialouge)Carr mentions something along the lines that judgments and actions are conditioned by the past. Because it is always there to provide a backdrop and context.Some theorists argue that the past/history is an illusion and its only function is to comment on the present. (Have a look at Tosh, J. and Lang, S.'s The Pursuit of History. and/or The History of ideas - By Preston King)and if you want to get really into the whole history is made up thing look at Jean Baudrillard who bascially says history is totally meaningless because we no longer know what the situation was like when the events took place so it is impossible to interpret them without that knowledge.hope this helps
No, an opinion is not a fact. An opinion is a personal belief or judgment, while a fact is a statement that can be proven true or false based on evidence.
it is an opinion that is not based on fact, but is based sole on opinion.
No, a fact is based on objective evidence and can't become an opinion. However, how people interpret or perceive a fact can vary, leading to different opinions about its significance or implications.
This question is based more on opinion than fact. In my opinion writing is harder.
Fact. A statement that can be proven is based on evidence or objective criteria, making it a fact rather than an opinion. Facts are verifiable and not influenced by personal beliefs or feelings.
The term opinionated fact is a slang term used to describe someone who has based their opinion on string facts. In reality there is no such thing as an opinionated fact. An opinion is a belief whereas a fact cannot be debated.
Is opinion
theory
This is an opinion based question. Fact cannot answer this question. In my personal opinion though, it shouldn't.
Observation is stating a given fact that has nothing to do with your opinion. In contrast to that an inference is when you make an assumptions based on your INTERPRETATION of a fact.
A fact is a statement that can be proven true or false based on evidence, while an opinion is a statement that reflects a person's beliefs, feelings, or thoughts and cannot be proven true or false. Facts are objective and verifiable, while opinions are subjective and based on personal interpretation.
No, opinions are subjective beliefs or judgments, while facts are objective and verifiable information. It is not possible to form an opinion on a fact because facts are based on evidence and are not open to interpretation.