No.
They were a good thing because they loved cheese burgers!
I think that he was a good emperor because unlike some other emperors he didn't start off nice then turn bad. He was always for the people. Rome reached its extent when he was ruling. And he didn't force poor people to pay taxes For more info visit Wikipedia
Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!Everyone obeyed Hadrian. He was the emperor!
Publius Aelius Traianus Hadrianus born on 24 January 76 AD/ CE became Emperor of Rome at 117 AD/ CE until his death at 138 AD/ CE. During his reign the Empire was extended from the British isles and the Atlantic to Black and Red seas. He was the third of the five good Emperors of Rome.
Elagabalus, also known as Heliogabalus, who ruled as Roman emperor from 218 to 222 AD, was known for his extravagant and scandalous behavior. He was accused of committing numerous atrocities, including murdering family members, engaging in incestuous relationships, and desecrating religious traditions, such as introducing the worship of the sun god Elagabalus to Rome. Elagabalus's reign was marked by instability and ended with his assassination at the age of 18.
Elagabalus was born in 203.
Elagabalus died on 222-03-11.
He was 14 or 15 when he became Emperor in May 218 A.D. and died at the age of 18 on 11th March 222 A.D.
Gratian was he was 8 years old at his Accession. he ruled from 364-375 i believe however he arguably was never a true emperor because he shared rule with his father and uncle for the whole of his regime. Hope this helps
Elagabalus's failure as a Roman emperor stemmed from his despotic rule, extravagance, and scandalous behavior. He alienated the Roman Senate and military with his erratic decisions, such as attempting to introduce Eastern religious practices to Rome. His reign was marked by corruption and instability, ultimately leading to his assassination in 222 AD.
well there is a roman emporer called elagabalus who was born 203 AD and died on the 11th march 222AD
Only he or she can say.
During the year 222 AD the historical event that occured was that Julia Soaemias assassinated her Emperor, whom was Emperor Elagabalus, as well as the Emperor's mother.
no he was not. there is no such thing as an Emperor of Europe. He was the emperor of Austria. :)
because he just was xD
69 Sherlock