none really other than internal structure - they were both based off the idea that we should be ruled by philosopher kings not the general populous
Chat with our AI personalities
The difference between the Roman Republic and the Greek democracy was that:
the word democracy derived from an ancient greek term
The Greeks invented the idea of democracy. However, their concept of democracy was different. Nowadays we have indirect democracy, which means that the people elect representatives of the people and it is them who vote on bills. The Greek had direct democracy, which means that it was the people themselves, gathered in the assembly of the people, who voted on bills. Demorcacy means power by the people in Greek. Both the Greeks and the Romans had the concept of citizenship and the idea that citizens had rights. During the Roman Republic and in the Greek democracies, this included the right to vote. It has to be noted that not all Greek states had democracies and in that other states (such as kingdoms, oligarchies and tyrannies) there was no voting. During the period of rule by emperors which followed the Roman Republic the people no longer voted and there was absolute rule by emperors. During the Roman Republic there was also the power of veto. The idea for American veto system came from the Romans.
Ancient Greece and Rome both influenced the democratic development of England and America; even more largely, western civilization as a whole. The invention of democracy by various Greek city-states was one key contribution of Greece, while the republican government of Rome, along with Roman implementation of an extensive legal system, provided another set of powerful influences.
The differences between the Eastern Empire and Western Empire is their languages and foods they eat. The Western Empire spoke Italian. A Eastern spoke Greek.
No. The Ancient Greek use to wear Chitons while the Romans wore Toga. Visually you can see a difference between these two garments as well.