Alexius starved Bohemond of supplies by cutting his supply lines
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The First Crusade resulted in the Christians taking control of Jerusalem.
In the second crusade the nobles did not prepare for the attack by the Turks. There was division among the crusaders which was as a result of the uncertainties.
Alexius starved Bohemond of supplies by cutting his supply lines
Yes, the second crusade was a fail.
Second Crusade happened in 1145.
The result of the Crusade of Nobles was an increase of trade on the European continent. The crusade opened trade routes that had not been used before.
The result of the Crusade of Nobles was an increase of trade on the European continent. The crusade opened trade routes that had not been used before.
No in the second crusade.
Germany See link below for information on the Second Crusade.
The First Crusade was highly successful, while the Second was not.
I tyink he answer to "who was the french leader of the second crusade" is Louis VII.
The second crusade was called in 1145 and ended in 1149. There is a link to an article on it below.
One significant difference between the First Crusade and the Second Crusade is the outcomes. The First Crusade resulted in the capture of Jerusalem by the Christian forces, while the Second Crusade did not achieve its primary objective of recapturing Edessa. Additionally, the First Crusade was more successful and united in its goals, while the Second Crusade faced more challenges and internal conflicts among the Christian leaders.