answersLogoWhite

0

Stockholders of large corporations, many of whom had never seen a mine, made the most share of wealth.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Most of the wealth from the many mines in the West was gained by the?

large mining corporations


In what ways were the roman social classes unequal?

Patricians, in the early days of the city, had most of the wealth and most of the government positions. The Plebeians were the downtrodden and the working class until they revolted and gained their civil rights. There were other classes of people besides the patricians and plebeians. The class of the person depended a great deal upon the wealth of the person. The more wealth/money a person had, the higher his status. A person's wealth also gave him the option of entering a higher class if he could meat the financial requirements.


Did the patricians have the most power in rome?

Yes, the patricians did share plenty of power with the plebeians. Think of the office of tribune, who was a plebeian and could veto any legislation or resolution that the patricians put forward.


Why are patricians rich?

Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.Patrician is a class connotation, not necessarily a wealth connotation. True, at the beginning of the city, the patricians were the wealthy class, owning most of the land and the wealth the land generated. However over the years many patrician families lost their wealth, the dictator Sulla, being a prime example. Julius Caesar himself, although a patrician, was not a wealthy man at the start of his career. In the class conscious Roman society, if you were born into a patrician family, you were a patrician, no matter what you financial status happened to be.


Who gain the most power from the crusade?

The Crusades primarily benefited the papacy and the Roman Catholic Church, as they significantly increased the Church's influence and authority in Europe. The successful mobilization of armies and resources under the banner of Christianity reinforced the pope's role as a leader of Christendom. Additionally, various monarchs and nobles gained power by acquiring land and wealth during the campaigns, but overall, the Church emerged as the most powerful institution in the aftermath of the Crusades.

Related Questions

Most of the wealth from the many mines in the West was gained by the?

large mining corporations


What did Japan most have to gain from conquering China?

Japan did not originally have many natural resources, China had many such as farm's and mines. So when they took over China they gained all of China's recourses


What contributed to most to nubia wealth?

The wealthy kingdom of Nubia had important gold mines. Pharaohs of the middle kingdom conquered Nubia and used its wealth.


Who buys white clay from a mine?

There are many companies that buy white clay from mines. Most of the white clay comes from mines that is sold in the U. S. .


Who closed most mines conservatives or labor?

pre thatcher labour closed most mines in the uk


Does Italy have the most gold mines in the world?

yes! There use to be many gold thieves in Italy .


Which africn country has several diamond mines?

Botswana


What factor contributed most to the growth of trade in new kingdom?

wealth


Which US state has the most collieries?

There are a total of fifty-two coal mines in the United States. The state with the most collieries is Wyoming which has thirteen coal mines and they are surface mines.


What territory of Canada produces the most diamonds?

From the list of diamond mines, below, it appears that Northwest Territories is the location of the most mines.


How did the Spanish defeat of the Aztecs effect Spain overseas?

It effected Spain all right. They had gained control of one of mexicos most powerful sociatys. They had more land, lots of gold had been gained the Aztects being put as slaves in the gold mines and almost all of their culture destroyed by Spanish Missonarys...


Who gained the medals in gallipoli?

who gained the most medals