answersLogoWhite

0

Because there is no right or wrong answer in history, nothings for sure.

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Who said that history is an argument without end?

Pieter Geyl said so.


What is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources?

Interpretation is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources.


What was the purpose of the Missouri Compromise?

To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)


What is the name for an argument about history that is supported by scources?

An argument about history that is supported by sources is often referred to as a "historical thesis" or "historical argument." This type of argument relies on primary and secondary sources to substantiate claims and interpretations about past events. Historians analyze evidence to construct narratives or perspectives that contribute to our understanding of history.


What is the term for an argument history that is supported by sources?

theme


Something you agree to accept or to do in order to reach argument or end an argument?

I believe that would be a compromise.


What is the term for an argument about history that is supported by sources?

theme


What did vikings do if they had an argument?

They fought it out and it could end it death for one of them.


Why is there a need to persuade others?

If there was no persuasion there would be no argument without argument there can only be one answer and there's always more then one answer.


What was the phrase the colonies used to their argument?

no taxition without representation.


What was the colonists biggest argument about the taxes?

Taxation without representation.


How did the argument between India and Pakistan begin?

see history of jammu and kashmir for this