Because there is no right or wrong answer in history, nothings for sure.
Pieter Geyl said so.
"History" comes from the Ancient Greek "istoria", which refers to a narrative or accounting of past events. the argument that it is a blending of "his" and "story" is fictitious.
it begined in 1789
The only substantial change was the fall of communism. That's why Fukuyama wrote about end of history.
a frozen moment without movement or sound, but with focus
Pieter Geyl said so.
Interpretation is the name for an argument about history that is supported by sources.
To end an argument about slavery in the territories (apex)
theme
I believe that would be a compromise.
theme
They fought it out and it could end it death for one of them.
If there was no persuasion there would be no argument without argument there can only be one answer and there's always more then one answer.
no taxition without representation.
Taxation without representation.
see history of jammu and kashmir for this
"No taxation without representation"