Was 1915 a leap year

Answer 1

No, it was not. We often thing that all years that are multiples of 4 are leap years, but there are two exceptions to the general rule.

1. Century years - year numbers divisible by 100 - are NOT leap years, except....

2. Years that are evenly divisible by 400, such as 1600, 2000, and 2400, ARE leap years.

If the Earth took exactly 365 days to go around the Sun, there would be no need for leap years. If the Earth took exactly 365.25 years to go around the Sun, then we would still need Exception #1.

But the Earth actually takes 365.26 days to go around the Sun, so we need both exception rules.

Answer 2

No. It is not divisible by 4. 1816 was a leap year.

Answer 3

No.

Leap years are even numbered years which are divisible by 4.

Answer 4

No, odd-numbered years are never leap years in the Gregorian and Julian calendars.

Answer 5

No, it was not.

Answer 6

Yes, 1812 was a leap year.

Answer 7

Yes - divisible by four!

Answer 8

No. 1945 was not a leap year.

Answer 9

1915 was not a leap year.

Answer 10

No, 1841 was not a Leap Year.