"Time is of the essence" is the correct version of the saying.
No. Neither the phrase nor the question employs correct English grammar.The answer to "Does this phrase use correct grammar?""Anyone's sight wasn't catch a glimpse of your essence" could be written as "No one's eyes could ever catch a glimpse of your true essence." This is poetic but somewhat of a truism, because essences are by definition seldom observable.
It is common to say "Time is of the essence" Meaning it is important that this be done quickly or on time.
It is common to say "Time is of the essence" Meaning it is important that this be done quickly or on time.
"Short on time" is the correct phrase. It means lacking sufficient time for a particular task or activity.
The correct phrase is "we have not drunk in a long time." "Drank" is the simple past tense of "drink," while "drunk" is the past participle, which is used with auxiliary verbs like "have."
We shall set a time for them to meet
It's show time!
The correct phrase is "What time is it?" This is the typical word order for asking about the current time in English.
The phrase "Time is of the essence" was coined in legal contracts to emphasize the importance of meeting deadlines and obligations within the specified time frame. It is widely used in business and legal contexts to signify that punctuality and timeliness are crucial to the agreement.
Yes, the phrase "What is the time by your watch?" is correct. It is a polite and common way to ask someone for the current time based on the watch they are wearing.
"It's time he did" is the correct phrase. It is in the subjunctive mood, indicating a hypothetical or desired action in the past.
Include the feeling of a place and time