Go to snopes categories, review the George W. Bush section then the Obama section. Decide for yourself.
The website's name "Snopes" is a combination of the founder's parents' names, David and Barbara Mikkelson. They started the site as a small blog to debunk urban legends and myths, later expanding it into a popular fact-checking website.
Snopes is an online fact-checking and reference site that investigates urban legends, rumors, and misinformation. They provide evidence-based articles and updates to debunk or confirm various claims circulating in media and online.
Snopes is generally considered a reputable fact-checking website that helps debunk myths and misinformation. However, like all sources, it is important to cross-reference information and be aware of any potential biases.
Yes, Snopes is generally considered a legitimate source for fact-checking and debunking myths and misinformation. They are known for their thorough research and transparent sourcing of information. However, it's always good to cross-reference information with multiple sources for verification.
For general information, reputable news organizations such as The New York Times, BBC, and NPR are considered reliable sources. For fact-checking and research, websites like factcheck.org and Snopes can provide trustworthy information. It's important to verify information from multiple sources to ensure accuracy.
Snopes is pronounced as "snohps." The "o" in Snopes is pronounced like the "o" in "no."
Snopes is pronounced as "snoh-ps".
I have finally come to the conclusion that snopes is not impartial, factual, neutral or unbiased where Oback Obama is concerned. I have really tried to be neutral myself but have to face the fact that I have never read even potentially critical response of any of snopes responses to the accusations or questions about Obama's viewpoints, behaviors, or background. No matter how much Obama might be admired by someone, he is not a perfect person any more than I - or you are.
no
Snopes seeks to legitimatize or disprove rumors. It can not be categorized as partisan.
Yes, the Singapore principal letter is debunked by Snopes.
Yes, the monkey ladder experiment is not debunked by Snopes.
Yes, the story of Ross Capicchioni is verified by Snopes.
Not an app, but the Snopes site can be bookmarked on your browser and accessed via Wi-Fi.
Yes, the story of the Ourang Medan has been debunked by Snopes.
Lucifer
no......!