0
What else can I help you with?
Is wisdom different from knowledge and information?
Yes. Wisdom is very different from knowledge and information. Wisdom, in the sense that it is used most commonly and as it is defined by secular dictionaries, is the ability to apply knowledge to real life. Wisdom, in the sense of one of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit, is the ability to put things in order and to judge things in accordance with God's ways. It comes from union with God, and it leads to union with God. It is knowledge of God and the ability to apply knowledge of Him to out lives, in dealing with both natural and divine matters. Knowledge, in the common sense, is knowing something, from experience or theory. Information is the facts that are known. Knowledge, in the sense of one of the Gifts of the Holy Spirit, is the ability to judge matters of faith. Through knowledge, we can recognize the Creator in the created, and so not be distracted from the Creator by His creations. It also helps us to sense what is and is not in accord with the truth. So wisdom and knowledge are very different. In their theological senses, they are both gifts of the Holy Spirit, which are received at Confirmation. Knowledge is the ability to discern in matters of faith. Wisdom is the ability to use our knowledge in our lives and thus reach closer union with God.
Differentiate a intelligent person and a wise person?
There are different ways in which a person can be intelligent but they revolve around sharpness of mind.A person could be intelligent in being excellent at solving math problems.A person could be intelligent in their ability to influence people.An intelligent person can be described as someone showing sound judgment and rationalityA wise person is someone who is able to discern or judge what is true, right, or lasting. They exhibiting common sense, they may not have the rationale for a judgment but they know it to be right, which it is.
If group members end up working around shirkers do you think this information should be communicated to the instructor so that each individuals contribution to the project is judge more fairly?
Yes, it is important to communicate to the instructor if group members are not contributing equally to the project. This ensures that each individual's contribution is recognized and evaluated fairly. The instructor may be able to intervene or provide guidance on how to address the issue within the group.
What is the main difference between informational listening and critical listening?
Critical thinking uses rational reason, whereas in empathic listening tunes in to the feelings and emotions. Critical thinking involves determining the meaning and significance of what is observed or expressed, or, concerning a given inference or argument, determining whether there is adequate justification to accept the conclusion as true. Critical listening is listening in order to evaluate and judge, forming opinion about what is being said. Judgment includes assessing strengths and weaknesses, agreement and approval. This form of listening requires significant real-time cognitive effort as the listener analyzes what is being said, relating it to existing knowledge and rules, whilst simultaneously listening to the ongoing words from the speaker. Informational listening, the next step beyond discriminating between different sound and sights is to make sense of them. To comprehend the meaning requires first having a lexicon of words at our fingertips and also all rules of grammar and syntax by which we can understand what others are saying. The same is true, of course, for the visual components of communication, and an understanding of body language helps us understand what the other person is really meaning. In communication, some words are more important and some less so, and comprehension often benefits from extraction of key facts and items from a long spiel. Comprehension listening is also known as content listening, informative listening and full listening. One difference is the comprehensive or informational listening could be done before the critical listening.
What is the difference between subjective scoring and objective scoring?
these are two completely different ways on deciding the end results of a game.OBJECTIVE SCORING: this relies on how well you do in a game, who wins the most points before time has ran out or until the games end point.so it purly relies on your perfomance.SUBJECTIVE SCORING: however this relies on the opinion of a judge they decide how well you do then they mark your perfomance.examples of objective scoring:badmintonhockeyfootballvolleyballbasketballGOLF- this however relies on the LEAST amounts of points you get is who wins.examples of subjective scoring:gymnasticsyncronhised swimmingice skatingsnow boardingskate boardingetc.(:
What means being able to evaluate information in order to judge whether it is true or not.?
discerning
What word means being able to evaluate information in order to judge whether it is true or not?
discerning
What does the word evaluate mean in Social Studies?
In Social Studies, "evaluate" typically means to assess or judge the importance, quality, or significance of something. It involves analyzing information, drawing conclusions, and forming an opinion based on evidence.
What are synonyms of evaluate?
5 synonyms of 'evaluate' would be: -assess -judge -appraise -assay -gauge
What does the word evaluate?
to judge and give reason for your opinion
What are two synonyms for evaluate?
assess, judge, rate
How do critical and creative thinking enhance the life of an individual?
Evaluation;to judge whether something is right or wrong thus it will equip someone to have mentality discipline to habitually evaluate knowledge.
What is the synonym of compare?
corresponding. like.
What does evaluate mean in critical thinking?
In critical thinking, to evaluate means to assess, judge, or determine the value or worth of something based on evidence or criteria. It involves analyzing information, arguments, or ideas in order to form a reasoned judgment or decision.
Who has the authority to direct control evaluate judge performance of an individual?
supervisior
Which cognitive skill in critical thnkning has to do with your ability to judge?
The cognitive skill in critical thinking that has to do with your ability to judge is evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the credibility, relevance, and logical strength of information or arguments to make informed decisions or reach sound conclusions.
The definition of evaluate?
To evaluate means to assess or judge the value, importance, or quality of something based on specific criteria or standards. It involves carefully examining and analyzing information to form an informed opinion or decision.
