0
Through the UK's parliamentary electoral system (First-past-the-post), the winning party nearly almost always rules a majority government (meaning they have at least 326 Member of Parliament), which will in turn make a strong and stable government; coalition governments lead to compromise for the parties involved, and are prone to failing for the whole five year term.
The regularity with which the UK calls its elections also help to ensure the government is strong and stable - five years is generally regarded as the correct length of term, as it enables the public to change their government regularly but is long enough for changes to be made (parliamentary bills can take years to passed).
What else can I help you with?
Does Chile have a stable or unstable government?
Chile has a stable government. It is a democratic republic with a long history of political stability. The country has a strong democratic tradition, with regularly held free and fair elections, and a well-established system of governance.
What was Charlemagne able to do?
how to create a strong and stable government
Why were the British able to expand?
it had a strong stable government.
Why is France's government effective?
Yes, France's government is stable. Members of the lower house of parliament (the Assemblée Nationale) are elected just after the presidential elections and for the same period of time, five years. The president's party (whatever it is) usually wins a majority by itself, meaning that it is does not have to bow to coalition associates.
Why was Britain able to expand its empire during the Industrial Revolution?
it had a strong stable government.
What became a strong part of Akbar's rule?
Economy with stable government, liberalism and pluralism.
Why Britain able to expand its empire during the industrial revolution?
it had a strong stable government.
Is it true A country with a developed economy is more likely to have a strong stable government?
True
Why was Britain able to expand the empire during the industrial revolution?
it had a strong stable government.
Is malaysia's government stable?
yes it is very strong . . . . . since 1952 it has been the strongest in Asia
Why was Britain able to expand its epire during the industrial revolution?
its government was strong and stable <--- nova net
Which type of government has the weakest national government Why is it considered weak?
There is no definitive answer to this question as it depends on a variety of factors, including the specific country in question and the particular type of government. However, in general, governments with a weak national government are considered to be less effective and less stable than those with a strong national government. This is because a weak national government is less able to effectively manage the country's affairs and to protect the rights and interests of its citizens. In addition, a weak national government is more likely to be overthrown by a strong, centralized government.
