* All Citizens have a right to participate equally in governing the nation. * Nations have a role in the process of achieving American equality. * Equality is a citizen's right and not something for only the privileged. * Privilege like slavery no longer exists. * Existence depends not on world domination, but on the will of All Citizens * The original democratic ideas were: * That, The South was entitled to more rights; * African-Americans were not citizens, but property * And that The Southern States had the right to secede
They view it as a way to brainwash stupid redneck hillbillies.
They were blocked from changing the system from within, but their views were the Puritans became a major political force in England and came to power as a only in their piety and discipline but in their democratic practices".
party platformparty platform
. It brought the democratic party back into national power, it also gave the nation a new view on government regulation of the nations social and economic life.
Politicians had different views on many different subjects, so they formed specific political parties that shared their view.
political party
The Progressives did not bolt from the Democratic Party in 1948. They were actually an increasingly dominant part of the Democratic party in the 1950s and 1960s. The Dixiecrats bolted because the Democratic Party was becoming increasingly race-neutral (i.e. not racist). This alienated a number of southern Democrats (who called themselves Dixiecrats) who felt that their view of the South and the future of the nation could not be properly dealt with by a race-neutral Democratic party.
he was the head of the opposite party, the democratic republicans. Thus, his opinions were the oposite of that of the federalists.
James Madison was the co-founder, along with Thomas Jefferson, of the political party opposing the Federalists, known as the Democratic-Republicans. They formed the party in response to their disagreements with the policies of the Federalist Party, particularly their view of a strong central government. Madison and Jefferson advocated for states' rights and a more limited role for the federal government.
Syria's view on democracy is largely shaped by its authoritarian regime, led by President Bashar al-Assad. The government maintains that its political system, characterized by a single-party rule and limited political pluralism, is necessary for stability and national unity, especially given the country's complex sectarian and ethnic landscape. While there have been calls for democratic reforms, the regime has often suppressed dissent and portrayed itself as a bulwark against extremism, prioritizing security over democratic governance. Overall, the official stance is that democracy, as understood in the Western context, is not applicable or desirable in Syria's current socio-political environment.
Jefferson and Madison had different view points than Hamilton.
If you mean Democratic as in, pertaining to the Democratic party, then the Democratic party has argued that gays should be able to serve in the military. If you mean democratic as in, what the population would vote for in a referrendum, then it depends entirely on the population in question. I think that such a referrendum in the USA today would be very tight between supporters and opponents.