Well under Marx's theory really nothing changes from slave owning to feudal society, you still have two different classes which there are haves and have nots. the technologies of the time may change but the social relations of the classes do not change because there is still haves and have nots. Under Marx all societies even in modern today have this dramatic difference the only time it didn't was under tribal society where the progress of the "tribe" was more important than the benefit of a single person or class.
The main types of Gentry classes are the Aristocracy (highest social class, typically inherited titles and wealth), the Gentry (land-owning class below the aristocracy), and the Yeomanry (property-owning class below the gentry). These classes traditionally held significant power and influence in society.
Karl Marx is a famous representative of the conflict theory. He believed that society is characterized by conflict between different social classes, especially between the working class (proletariat) and the owning class (bourgeoisie).
A Bushido which was renamed Daimyo under the Ashikaga Shogunate.
1. land owning aristocrats 2. peasant farmers 3. merchants
Communism and democracy are not mutually exclusive. If you mean different from a Capitalist country ( not necessarily a democracy! ), the difference is that in a communist country the State is the only stockholder, owning all the means of production, the factories and stores and businesses.
owning slaves
The Maya society was divided into several classes, including the nobility (including kings, priests, and warriors), commoners (including farmers, merchants, and craftsmen), and slaves. The nobility held the highest status and had privileges such as owning land and overseeing religious ceremonies. Commoners made up the majority of the population and were responsible for farming, trade, and craft production. Slaves were at the bottom of the social hierarchy and were often prisoners of war or individuals who could not pay off debts.
Both peasants and slaves in Aztec society had limited rights and freedoms, such as not owning property or being able to move freely. Additionally, both groups were expected to provide labor for the benefit of the ruling classes, whether through agricultural work or serving in households or temples. Both peasants and slaves were socially marginalized and had little opportunity for social mobility.
Until the 19th century it was the "grandes", the high, land-owning nobility.
Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.Plebeians and patricians were members of ancient Roman society. They were two of the social classes which were considered the nobility by the mid republic because they were the two groups who could trace their ancestry back to the beginning of the city.
Marx and Engels outlined the two warring classes as the bourgeoisie (capitalist class, owning the means of production) and the proletariat (working class, who sell their labor). They argued that history is shaped by the struggle between these two classes.
In some Africa societies, owning cattle is a sign of wealth. Cattle can be used as a dowry.