no the royal family should not be banned
Yes it should be capitalized.
There is more to being a Royal
No law in the United Kingdom bans the marriage of a Roman Catholic to a member of the Royal Family. If a member of the Royal Family marries a Catholic then they are simply removed from the Line Of Succession. On the 28 Oct 2011 Leaders of the Commonwealth agreed that descendants of Prince Charles will be able to marry a Catholic and remain in succession to the throne.
She has brought unneeded attention to herself, and The Royal Family!
No pesticide should not be banned. Do you want bugs to be crawling all over you house, food, children, or family?
Yes.
The British Royal Family The Norwegian Royal Family The Spanish Royal Family The Swedish Royal Family The Dutch Royal Family The Danish Royal Family The Belgian Royal Family The Thai Royal Family The Monegasque Princely Family The Luxembourgish Grand Ducal Family The Liechtensteiner Princely Family
No, they're harmless.
Yes, we should keep the royal family. They are tradition of the country. They show the history of the country and they are a huge tourist draw and the country makes millions from them every years.
Three reasons why they should have their privileges taken away:The monarch no longer wields any real power, so should therefore no longer hold the privileges associated with that power.The royal family cost the taxpayer a substantial sum to maintain their lifestyle.The royal family is an outdated and no longer relevant tradition.Three reasons why they should retain their privileges:The royal family is an important part of Britain's culture and history.The royal family generates far more income from tourism than it costs in taxes.The monarch is a politically neutral representative of the British people.
yes they are banned from here in New Mexico
By the Grace of God, is the most common explanation as to why a Royal family is the Royal family.