Direct rule allows for centralized control and uniformity in governance, often leading to quicker decision-making and implementation of policies. However, it can result in resentment among local populations, as it may disregard cultural practices and autonomy. Indirect rule, on the other hand, promotes local governance and can foster cooperation and legitimacy among indigenous leaders, but it may lead to inconsistencies in policy application and weaker central authority. Each system has its own strengths and weaknesses, making their effectiveness context-dependent.
indirect rule
Direct rule refers direct control as regards administration whereas indirect rule means self-governing.
Angola was under direct rule by Portugal until it gained independence in 1975.
Boer republics were under direct rule
Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)
indirect
direct
direct pooop
with direct rule the colonizing established a completely new governmental administration for its colony.under indirect rule the colonizing country ruled through traditional local leaders.
direct democracy is when each person rules and indirect is when people vote for people who rule.
Direct rule involves the colonial power governing the colony directly through its own officials and institutions, while indirect rule involves governing through local leaders and existing tribal structures. Direct rule is more centralized and involves greater control by the colonial power, while indirect rule allows for more local autonomy and collaboration with indigenous authorities.
Two advantages 1. Recognition of traditional chief 22