the obvious difference is that constitutional is a system for governance, often codified as a written document, that establishes the rules and principles of an autonomous political entity. In the case of countries, this term refers specifically to a national constitution defining the fundamental political principles, and establishing the structure, procedures, powers and duties, of a government.
-Wikipedia
Constitutional is something that is in agreement with the constitution, like a law or document or bill. Unconstitutional, decided by the supreme court, would be something that goes against of defies the constitution, also things such as a bill, law, or document.
Constitutional means the statement or law is in agreement with the Constitution of the United States. Say a law that says ' Anyone can drink out of a public drinking fountain' would be constitutional because it agrees with the constitution on the matter of "All men are created equal" This means all people will have equal rights and no body can legally discriminated from drinking at a public drinking fountain. Lets also say that some congressman decides to try and pass a law that says 'Only whites can drink out of public drinking fountains' This law is unconstitutional BECAUSE it discriminates against a certain group (black people in this case). This conflicts with the constitutional statement "All men are created equal".
Nonconstitutional governments, besides the fact that they do not have a constitution, are different from constitutional governments in that they are usually monarchies or dictatorships. Rulers whose very word is law would not like the idea that they have to follow some sort of rulebook. Governments who have constitutions almost always have some sort of ruling body of people to make sure that the constitution is followed. An example of this is the three branches of government in the United States.
A constitutional Government is obliged to work within the frame work of what it is authorised to do according to rules set out in the constitution. A non constitutional government can do whatever it wants.
Nothing they are the same.
nonconstitutional objections
yes..true
The key difference between constitutional and conformational isomers in organic chemistry is that constitutional isomers have different connectivity of atoms in their molecular structure, while conformational isomers have the same connectivity of atoms but differ in the spatial arrangement of atoms due to rotation around single bonds.
1 of them is were the government lives
In a constitutional monarchy, the king or queen is the head of state, but they are checked by the provisions of the constitution. The monarch in a ceremonial position is merely a figurehead.
Constitutional isomers have different connectivity of atoms in their molecules, while stereoisomers have the same connectivity but differ in the spatial arrangement of atoms.
Fundamental right is for every citizen while constitutional right is given by the constitution to indivual e.g. public servant etc.
If the monarchy is not a constitutional monarchy, then essentially they are all dictatorships.
the dictatorial has unlimited power by the head of government or head of state
judges in the special courts do not serve lifetime appointments Constitutional Courts have a broader jurisdiction compared to special courts.