The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution gives the federal government authority over states. It mandates that judges at the state level, must follow federal law when a conflict arises between state law and federal law.
The Supreme Law of the Land Is the Constitution. And the Constitution has all the laws In it so it has overall authority.
No. Because of the tendency of the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the federal government as well as the "supremacy clause" (Federal Laws override state laws if there is a conflict) in the constitution, the federal government exercises more authority and overall power than state governments.
Using a very broad brush, there are two modern types of governments also called "states". And, this question and its proper answer has nothing to do with democratic or non-democratic governments. Nor does it require a government with a formal constitution. The latter term simply refers to a codified set of laws and standards. With that said the two main classes of governments are unitary and federal.A unitary state is one organized under a single central government. What ever powers held by districts within the overall authority, are given to these bodies at the discretion of the central government. Perhaps better understood is that the central government "came first" and then distributed various powers to the areas or districts under the control of the central government. In the Federal system governing a state, the central government is the creation of the standing legal bodies. These creators set limits and set specific responsibilities (usually by a written constitution ) for the central government. And all unassigned responsibilities by default belong to the individual parts that have created the new central government. These are the standard modern political science based definitions of the two major types of states.
John Lansing, Jr. was a delegate to the Constitutional Convention of 1787. His views on the Constitution are not well-documented, but he did express concerns about granting too much power to the federal government. Overall, it can be said that Lansing wanted a more limited central government, with greater protection for states' rights and individual liberties.
No. Because of the tendency of the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the federal government as well as the "supremacy clause" (Federal Laws override state laws if there is a conflict) in the constitution, the federal government exercises more authority and overall power than state governments.
No. Because of the tendency of the Supreme Court to rule in favor of the federal government as well as the "supremacy clause" (Federal Laws override state laws if there is a conflict) in the constitution, the federal government exercises more authority and overall power than state governments.
Merchants and manufacturers may support a strong central government because it can create a stable economic environment that encourages trade and investment. A strong government can enforce laws and regulations that protect property rights, reduce corruption, and ensure fair competition. Additionally, centralized authority can facilitate the development of infrastructure, such as transportation and communication networks, which are crucial for business operations. Overall, a robust central government can promote economic growth and stability, benefiting merchants and manufacturers alike.
The 1876 Constitution of Texas significantly restructured the state's government by establishing a more decentralized and limited government framework. It created a clear separation of powers among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches, while emphasizing local control and reducing the power of the governor. Additionally, it introduced measures to enhance individual rights and promote democratic participation, reflecting a response to the centralized authority of the previous Reconstruction-era constitution. Overall, the 1876 Constitution has remained a foundational legal document for Texas governance.
James Madison originated the overall structure of our tricameral government.
Because they are the only overall governmental authority capable of enforcing those laws NATIONWIDE.
Jacob Broom was a delegate to Constitutional Convention. There were parts of the U.S. Constitution he agreed with and parts that he did not. For instance, he wanted the president to be elected for life. Overall though, he was a supporter of a strong central government and felt the Constitution provided that.
The national government's power is greater than that of any individual state. This was made to have one unified country. Before the Constitution was created, there was the Articles of Confederation. This document gave immense power to the states because the colonists feared if they created a strong central government, that they would have another King George III. However, this plan proved to not be the best as it felt as if there were 13 different countries instead of one. The founding fathers then got back together to create a better constitution, and they came up with the Constitution. This piece of work proved to be an excellent form of government that has influenced countless other nations in the world today. However, the major difference between the Articles of Confederation and the Constitution is that the Constitution gave direct power to the national government instead of the states.