0
People may think that the L of N would have been able to stop international aggression in the 1920's and 1930's but as countries became independent the L of N was unable to threaten with the stop of supplies to that country. They also couldn't stop it because they did not have an army.
What else can I help you with?
How did the league of nations respond to Italian aggression in 1953?
The League of Nations did not respond to Italian aggression in 1953 because it had already been dissolved in 1946, following World War II. The actions of Italy during that period were instead addressed by the newly established United Nations. The UN took on the responsibilities of maintaining international peace and security, focusing on conflicts and aggression that arose after the League's dissolution.
What international body was formed after World War 1?
The League of Nations.
What was the response of the league of nations to Japanese and Italian aggression How effective was this response?
The League of Nations was the precursor to the United Nations. The greatest failing of the League of Nations is its absolute inaction in response to aggression prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.
Why didn't Roosevelt take the issue of Japaneses aggression to the league of nations?
The United States was not a member of the League of Nations.
Why didnt roosevelt take the issue of japanese aggression to the league of nations?
The United States was not a member of the League of Nations.
Why didn t roosevelt take the issue of japaness aggression to the league of nations?
The united states was not a member of the league of nations
How did the other nations react to the aggression of the Japanese and the Italians?
They formed a collection to fight the Japanese and protect each other from opposing countries. =)
How did the league of nations western democracies respond to japan's aggression?
mad
What was meant to replace the League of Nations and created as a response to the aggression in World War 2?
United Nations
Describe one example of the league of nations' failure to stop territorial aggression?
One of the biggest failures to stop territorial aggression for the League of Nations was when Mussolini invaded Abyssinia. As a result Italy took over Abyssinia.
Was the league of nations successful at discouraging aggression in the 1920's?
Yes, the League of Nations was successful at discouraging aggression in the 1920's. An example is the successful arbitration between Finland and Sweden in their dispute over the Aland Islands.
What organization was meant to replace the League of Nations and created as a response to the aggression in World War 2?
United Nations
