Many countries viewed the League of Nations with a mix of hope and skepticism. Initially, it was seen as a pioneering effort for global cooperation and peace following World War I. However, its inability to enforce decisions, resolve conflicts effectively, and prevent aggression led to disillusionment among member states. Ultimately, this perceived ineffectiveness contributed to the League's decline and the rise of tensions that preceded World War II.
At it's height the League of nations supported 58 members
The US's rejection of the treaty caused many countries to withdraw from the League of Nations. The League of Nations late proved ineffective and was disbanded as the UN was formed in its place.
The US's rejection of the treaty caused many countries to withdraw from the League of Nations. The League of Nations late proved ineffective and was disbanded as the UN was formed in its place.
They formed treaties and pacts.In addition many formed the League of Nations and the United Nations, neither of which were very successful.
58
There are many things that are can arguably be in favor of the League of Nations. The League of Nations had many social successes by educating nations on the problems of drug smuggling and drug addiction.
Original Answer: Because they are decades away. Improved: The United Nations are not a country. They couldn't have "joined" the League of Nations. The League of Nations was the predecessor of the United Nations - the League of Nations failed, and so, many years later in 1942 (I believe it was that year) they founded the United Nations as an improved "League of Nations."
405
There are 193 countries in the UNO (United Nations Organizations)
There were about 26 countries during WWI.
People of many nations put their hopes into the League of Nations.
Member countries of the League of Nations often hesitated to provide soldiers due to a combination of national interests, lack of commitment to collective security, and the trauma of World War I. Many nations were reluctant to engage in military interventions that could lead to further conflicts or entanglements. Additionally, the League lacked its own military force and relied on member states to contribute troops, which often resulted in inaction when faced with aggression. This failure to enforce measures weakened the League's credibility and effectiveness in maintaining peace.