Italy makes 45.7 billion dollars off tourism a year. Italy has 44 world heritage sites. This is more than any other country in the world.
It depends in some ways. Heritage sites do need a lot of money to be taken care of properly but wasting that much money can have an advantage. Heritage sites need to be taken care of but they do require a lot of money. This can be good because you could learn a lot from it such as, it's history or significance. However, this can be bad as well. The money used can be used for important things for the community or the country. They use the money for making big buildings near it for an accommodation and build a huge parking lot. So then, the accommodations are on the budget as well. They are good because you could enjoy the heritage sites and you could tour around. But is it a waste of money? That would depend on your point of view.....
How much is the 1943 coin is worth
No, there are many species in much more danger than the panda.
No, the world can tolerate much greater temperatures than this. The human race, however, is in danger if global warming continues unchecked.
The cost to maintain a UNESCO World Heritage Site varies widely depending on factors such as location, size, and specific conservation needs. On average, annual maintenance expenses can range from tens of thousands to millions of dollars. Some sites require significant funding for restoration, infrastructure, and management, while others may have lower ongoing costs. Ultimately, the financial commitment is influenced by local economic conditions and the level of tourism.
alot
Mobile hairdressers are becoming much more popular in today's world and can be found at several online sites. Some of these online sites are "Barberbeautician" and "Hairfinder".
depends on what it is.
Maybe some danger if there are concommitant pathologies. Do it smart, do it thoroughly. Overall, MUCH less danger than staying with the N.
To the best of my knowledge, I have no Cherokee heritage.
It depends on the attribute of the world heritage, let's take a example: the Great Wall of China & the Ming Tombs in Beijing. If some fashion and entertainment activities are held on the Great Wall, it will add so much luster to the scenic spot. However, if the above-mentioned activities are held in the Ming Tomb, it's obvious not appropriate. So I'd say as a rule if the activity does not harm the site and is appropriate to its nature or function, and does not become the end in itself, there is no problem.