answersLogoWhite

0

Had no standing army and no real power to enforce its decrees

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Did German and Italian aggression against other nations begin before the world war 2?

yes


What was the response of the league of nations to Japanese and Italian aggression How effective was this response?

The League of Nations was the precursor to the United Nations. The greatest failing of the League of Nations is its absolute inaction in response to aggression prior to the outbreak of the Second World War.


Why did the league of nations fail to stop Italian aggression aganst Corfu in 1927?

because they were not sure they could win a war agins the Italians who had established ties with German


Why did the national league of nation prevent German and Italian aggression against other nations?

The League of Nations attempted to prevent German and Italian aggression through diplomatic negotiations, economic sanctions, and collective security measures. However, these efforts were not always successful in deterring the aggressive actions of these countries. Additionally, the League itself lacked the necessary enforcement mechanisms and the support of major powers to effectively curb the aggression of its member states.


The league of nations responded to italian aggression in 1935 with?

the League placed some economic sanctions on Italy but took no real action.


What might have been the outcome if Great Britain France and other European nations had not chosen to appease German Italian and Japanese aggression?

There would be a great amount of peace for all nations at that time.


Why didn't the leagues of nation prevent Germany and Italian aggression against other nations?

The League of Nations, much like the UN, was a 'toothless dog' that all dictators and despots laughed at. Do you see the UN stopping mass killing in Syria, or Sudan or other places where innocent civilians are being decimated .


What was the league of nations response to Italian aggression in 1935?

The League of Nations' response to Italian aggression in 1935 was ineffective. Instead of taking strong action to deter Italy's invasion of Ethiopia, the League imposed economic sanctions that were ultimately not enforced by its member states. This failure undermined the League's credibility and signaled its inability to effectively address acts of aggression by its member states.


What does Article 10 of the League of Nations Covenant provided for?

It was an attempt to guarantee the territorial integrity and political independence of member states against aggression.


How did the league of nations react to German Italian and Japanese aggression?

By 'advances' do you mean attempts to woo, that is, join the League or do you mean Hitler's triumphs in the 1930s?


Article x of the league of nations charter?

Art.10 of the League of Nations Covenant (1919) sought to...'respect and preserve against external aggression the territorial integrity and existing political independence of all Members of the League'...


How did roosevelt want the us and other nations to stop the aggression of the Japanese?

by the use of economic nations