Some nations argue that wealthier countries should pay reparations to poorer nations due to historical injustices such as colonialism, exploitation, and slavery, which have contributed to systemic inequalities. They believe that these reparations can help address the economic and social disparities that persist today. Additionally, wealthier nations often benefit from resources and labor taken from poorer nations, creating a moral obligation to contribute to their development and support. This perspective emphasizes accountability and the need for equitable global relationships.
Wealthy nations, such as the United States, Japan, and Europe, are not required to share their wealth to poorer nations by providing food and education. These wealthy nations share out of sympathy and compassion.
It should be remembered that often the dire state that the poor nations find themselves in is as a result of the activity's of the wealthier nations in the first place. Many developing country's are only just starting to throw of the shackles placed on them by colonialism. Even country's Like the USA were involved in the bolstering of corrupt dictatorships especially in the country's that would one day be able to compete with them. putting all of this aside however it is in all our interests to see to it that all country's live a reasonable life in order to avoid the constant risk of war and eventually win the war against drowning in our own refuse.
Yes
They shouldn`t!
Some major decisions made in the Versailles treaty were: Germany was allowed to have only an army and a navy and not an air force. Germany was forced to pay reparations to cover the losses of the victors, all countries should be a part of the League of Nations, secret treaties were not allowed, countries should govern themselves and countries should reduce their armies strength and weapons.
Many people argue that rich nations have a moral responsibility to help poor nations economically due to global interdependence and historical factors. However, this is a complex issue with considerations related to efficiency, sustainability, and potential unintended consequences. Ultimately, the decision to provide economic assistance to poor nations is influenced by a combination of ethical, political, and practical considerations.
Some people would say there is no "new imperialism"-- that what we see in many cases is just the same old imperialism in a new form, aided by globalization and corporate money. It should also be noted that the term "imperialism" is a very contested and controversial term. Not everyone believes that economic expansion by richer nations is in fact imperialism. That said, there are many human rights groups which feel that the wealthier western nations are in fact guilty of a modern-day version of imperialism, by exploiting poorer nations (mostly in the third world), plundering their resources to make such goods as cellphones or computers. So there may not be one catchy word or phrase to describe this, but economic exploitation (or corporate exploitation) might be one way to express it.
The answer depends on your state laws and the ability of the parties to pay. If one parent earns a greater income, child support may be ordered in some courts. The child should live at a level the parents can afford. If the parental income is uneven the child should not live sparingly during the half year she is with the poorer parent or go from a spare living condition to a wealthier one.
yes thy should due
The central idea of the lifeboat metaphor in Garrett Hardin's essay "Lifeboat Ethics" is that affluent nations should limit their assistance to poorer nations to prevent overpopulation and depletion of resources. Hardin argues that providing unlimited help to those in need would ultimately lead to the detriment of both the donor and recipient nations. Through this metaphor, he advocates for a more controlled approach to aid and resource distribution.
because they are stupid
Yes, "United Nations" should be capitalized because it is the official name of an organization.