The membership of the League of Nations was problematic due to the absence of major powers, particularly the United States, which weakened its authority and effectiveness. Additionally, the requirement for unanimous decisions often led to gridlock, preventing prompt action in crises. Furthermore, countries were reluctant to commit to collective security measures, undermining the League's ability to prevent aggression and resolve conflicts. These issues ultimately compromised the League's credibility and effectiveness in maintaining peace.
cost of membership dues
no.
Approve the US' membership in the League of Nations.
You can read the story of the League of Nations in the attached link. I could find no evidence that France was a problem for the League of Nations. Germany was a big problem however.
William Cabot Lodge
The League of Nations failed because it did not have total membership, withdrawal was easy, it's Security Council was a law unto itself, it did not have a standing army... It was replaced with the United Nations.
Harding reflected isolationism by opposing U.S. membership in the League of Nations.
Yes they were in the assembley but not on the council, so they were not big decision makers
Woodrow Wilson
Woodrow Wilson
Woodrow Wilson
Some thought the treat dealt too harshly with Germany.Some thought participation in the League of Nations marked a permanent American commitment to international affairs.