Yes, a search and seizure can be considered reasonable without a warrant under certain exceptions, such as exigent circumstances, consent, or when evidence is in plain view. The Fourth Amendment allows for these exceptions when immediate action is necessary to prevent the destruction of evidence, ensure officer safety, or protect the public. However, the justification for such actions must be clearly established and often scrutinized by courts to ensure they adhere to constitutional protections.
Only the police can apply for a search warrant, and only a judge can approve of the search warrant. The police only apply for search warrants when they have reasonable suspicion that their suspect is hiding something illegal in his/her house.
Factors that determine whether a search is reasonable include obtaining a warrant from a judge, having probable cause to conduct the search, ensuring the search falls within the scope of the warrant, and conducting the search without violating constitutional rights such as the Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure.
warrant
A Search Warrant is 1 document An Arrest Warrant is 1 document. There is no document that allows both.
In the Bill of Rights the fourth amendment says the government must have a warrant and probable cause to search and/or seizure of your property.
A legal search would be authorized by a search warrant, signed by a judge.
search and seizure without warrant
if there is belief of illegal activities
Under the Constitution, which is the law of the land in the USA, Search and Seizure is legal when the police have received a search warrant normally signed by a local judge. There are some situations, depending on the jurisdiction (where the search takes place) in which the police don't require a search warrant signed by a judge.
They already have a warrant for the arrest of a person so they do not need another one to entire the residence of the named person. However, they do need a search and seizure warrant to search the premises for anything or anyone not included in the "outstanding" warrant.
Search and seizure are two different things. A search is an intrusion into a reasonable expectation of privacy. A seizure is the taking or interference with custody or movement of a person or property. You can have a search without a seizure, and a seizure without a search. Either is unlawful if the search or seizure is not supported by the probable cause to believe that a crime has occurred, is about to occur, or is occurring, and the search or seizure will result in evidence of that crime. Probable cause is a reasonable belief, based on facts available to the person doing the searching and seizing, that criminal activity is taking place. With some exceptions, an officer can't conduct a search just because he wants to, or on pure speculation. There has to be some reasonable basis for the search.
Police conduct a legal search and seizure in accordance with the law by obtaining a search warrant from a judge based on probable cause. They must follow specific procedures outlined in the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, such as conducting searches in a reasonable manner and seizing only items specified in the warrant. Failure to adhere to these guidelines can result in evidence being deemed inadmissible in court.