It might be, but you can't tell without seeing how it is used in the sentence. Us is an object, but it can be either an indirect object or a direct object, depending on context. For example, in "Tell us a story", us is an indirect object. But in "They robbed us", us is a direct object.
The direct object is 'the lake'; the indirect object is 'us'.
It can be: They saw us. Or it could be an indirect object: They gave us the book. It depends on the sentence.
The indirect object in this sentence, "Your father told us that you are moving in two weeks," is "us." The indirect object is the one that isn't doing the thing, but having the thing done to it. If you remove all the extra information then the basic sentence (S V O) is: Your father told us -- us is the DIRECT object You is the INDIRECT object
Basic sentence: Neighbor gave kitten.Indirect is us.
"Us" is a pronoun, and can be both an "indirect object pronoun", and the object of a preposition, all at the same time. For example, it ("us") is the *indirect object* of the sentence: "He gave it to us". And it is also the *object* of the preposition "to". A preposition always has an object - it is the thing that the preposition acts on. "to me..." "me" is the object of the preposition "to". "from home..." "home" is the object of the preposition "from". "according to dad..." "Dad" is the object of the preposition "according to". But this concept of "object" of a preposition has nothing to do with the concepts of "direct object" or "indirect object" of a sentence. Consider this sentence: "He gave the tickets to us in order to please our mother." The sentence uses the preposition "to" twice: First, with the *indirect object* pronoun "us" as its prepositional *object* (...he gave the tickets to us...). The word "to" is also used again to introduce the *adverbial phrase* "...in order to please our mother". In this adverbial phrase, the phrase "...please our mother" is the *object* of the preposition "to" used in the adverbial phrase. The entire adverbial phrase modifies the verb "gave" - and, of course and more importantly, is neither a direct object or an indirect object of the sentence. It's an adverbial phrase. And its also the "object" of the preposition "to". As you can see, the concept of "object" of a preposition does not have anything to do directly with the concept of "direct object" or "indirect object" of a sentence.
The indirect object specifies the thing or person to which the direct object applies."The manager showed us his latest award." (direct object is "award")"He gave us nice Christmas presents." (direct object is "presents")
The direct object is card (her business card); the indirect object is us.
The direct object in the sentence"The usher found us seats near the stage."; would be seats. The indirect object would be us. My English teacher gave us this question on an exercise, and I think that is the answer.
In this sentence, "Chris" is the indirect object. The subject (the person who did the action) is James. The verb tells us what James did (he gave), the direct object tells us what he gave (twenty dollars), and the indirect object tells us to whom he gave it. A sentence cannot have an indirect object unless it has a direct object.
it ould be "us" cause thats who the pictures for
A noun in the objective case is a noun that is functioning as the direct or indirect object of a verb, or as the object of a preposition.EXAMPLESdirect object of a verb: Mom made cookies. (cookies are what mom made)indirect object of a verb: Mom made us cookies. (she made cookies for us)object of the preposition: Mom made cookies for us. (us is the object of the preposition 'for')
indirect object