answersLogoWhite

0

No. It has warped the US legal system badly.

User Avatar

Wiki User

16y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What has the author A Lakshminath written?

A. Lakshminath has written: 'Precedent in Indian Law' 'Precedent in the Indian legal system' -- subject(s): Stare decisis


What is a system of law based on precedent a customs called?

The Common Law


Does the system of precedent work only in theory?

It works and is used frequently.


What is a system of a law based on precedent and customs called?

The Common Law


Why was Islam sucesful?

Not many people know but I think it's because it was a new thing


What did colombu's contract say he would receive if he was sucesful?

he would recieve 10,000 mlds


What two types of precedent are there in doctrine of precedent?

binding(mandatory) precedent persuasive precedent


Is court precedent mandatory or persuasive?

That depends on which court you're referring to. In the federal court system, the US Supreme Court sets binding (or mandatory) precedent for all lower courts; the US Court of Appeals Circuit Courts set binding precedent for all US District Courts within their jurisdiction, but only persuasive precedent elsewhere; the US District Courts do not set binding precedent at all, they only set persuasive precedent.


Why was Hitler's army so sucesful?

tactics and training. and firm belief in service for Germany & Hitler


Express an argument for the continued use of precedent in our legal system today Counter this agreement by examining a disadvantage of the precedent system?

The continued use of precedent in our legal system is crucial as it promotes stability and predictability, allowing individuals and businesses to rely on established legal principles when making decisions. It also ensures consistency in judicial decisions, fostering public trust in the justice system. However, a significant disadvantage of the precedent system is that it can perpetuate outdated or unjust rulings, as courts may be hesitant to overturn established precedents even when societal values have evolved, potentially leading to inequities and a lack of responsiveness to contemporary issues.


An appeal to precedent is a type of?

an appeal to precedent is a type of an appeal to precedent is a type of


What does the system of judicial precedent mean?

The way the question is asked: USING judicial precedent, means that the judge is following the lead of a decision in a similar case that has already been decided upon and he is ruling the same way using the other case as a guideline. If the questioner meant to ask what does SETTING judicial precedent mean. . . that means that the judge was rendering a decision in a case of a type that had never been tried, or ruled upon, in the past, and that his verdict would set the 'precedent' by which all future cases might be judged. Judges, by the way, do NOT necessarily have to follow precedent in making rulings.