360 feedback (also known as multi-source feedback and multi-rater feedback) is a tool HR professionals use to help leaders in their organization develop. A typical 360 feedback campaign will involve a self-assessment along with ratings received from a number of other sources, thus creating a circle (i.e., 360 degrees) of feedback. These other sources, or other rater groups, typically include the individual's boss, peers, subordinates, but can also include other relevant groups such as customers, mentors, or board members. Usually certain groups of other raters (e.g., peers and subordinates) will be allowed to give anonymous ratings in order to allow for more honest feedback, without fear of retribution, while other groups (e.g., bosses and mentors) may be expected to give non-anonymous feedback so as to spark developmental conversations. In order to create an effective 360 feedback program, I suggested the following in another answer on this site, but these aspects bear repeating: First, effective 360 feedback systems should be linked to an organization's leadership competency model. In turn, this competency model should be linked to the organization's mission, vision, and strategy. In this way you can ensure the leader behaviors you are reinforcing are linked to the success of your organization. Second, 360 feedback should be used for developmental purposes only. If you use 360 feedback for evaluative purposes, people may game the system by giving their friends high ratings in return for high ratings from their friends, or people may be incentivized to give their peers low ratings to look better by comparison. Third, 360 feedback should be coupled with action planning, coaching, and training to support those leaders going through the program. Nothing is more demoralizing than getting feedback that you need to improve upon a skill and having no idea how to go about developing that skill, so leaders should be provided with ample support once they have received their feedback report. Finally, be sure to be open and honest when designing and communicating the purpose of the program. Participation from all ranks in the organization during the planning phase will not only increase buy in and participation in the program, it will increase the quality of the tool as well.
A 360 degree survey involves a method of gaining feedback from a variety of people about an individual's performance and can be a highly powerful input to performance management and employee development.
A 360 degree feedback is when you get feedback from peers, superiors, and people below you. Basically everyone.
A 360 degree feedback survey is feedback that comes from members of an employee's immediate work circle. It is also called multi-rater feedback and multi source assessment.
Although 360 degree feedback is usually used as part of an employee's personal evaluation and done in person, some companies do specialize in 360 degree feedback tools. Echospan and HalogenSoftware are two such companies.
360 degree feedback can be very effective. Managers are able to get a comprehensive view of the opinions and tasks of their employees that they might not be able to garner in face to face surveys. Non management can use 360 degree feedback as a tool to gauge their performance and those around them.
360 degree feedback surveys can be found on websites like SurveyMonkey, Qualtrics, and SurveyGizmo. Many HR software platforms also offer 360 degree feedback survey tools as part of their services. Additionally, some companies offer customized 360 degree feedback surveys that can be tailored to specific needs.
Yes
Three-hundred-sixty degree feedback has several disadvantages. Some of the disadvantages of three-hundred-sixty degree feedback are that it is costly and time-consuming.
Yes
Yes
Yes, General Electric uses a 360-degree feedback system to gather feedback on employee performance from various sources such as supervisors, peers, and subordinates. This feedback is used for performance evaluations and development purposes.
A 270-degree feedback is a performance appraisal method that collects feedback on an individual from multiple sources, typically including self-assessment, peer review, and input from supervisors or managers. Unlike the traditional 360-degree feedback, which includes feedback from subordinates as well, the 270-degree approach excludes this perspective, focusing instead on the individual's interactions with colleagues and supervisors. This method helps identify strengths and areas for improvement while fostering personal and professional development. It is often used in organizational settings to enhance communication and performance.