Usually that term refers to professional journals in any number of disciplines. When you submit an article to a journal, it goes through a review and editing process that helps assure (but cannot always guarantee) that the material submitted is legitimate, original and substantially free from error-- that kind of thing. The process also helps to establish (for science journals, anyway) that the research was carried out competently using appropriate equipment, materials and methodology, and that the references listed are timely and appropriate.
Yes, the source in EBSCO is peer-reviewed.
No, not all journals are peer-reviewed. Peer-reviewed journals have articles that are reviewed by experts in the field before they are published, but there are also non-peer-reviewed journals that do not have this review process.
Yes, the book has been peer-reviewed.
No, the content on Academia.edu is not peer-reviewed.
It is best to assume that no website is peer-reviewed.
Yes, Sage Journals are peer-reviewed.
Yes, the articles on ResearchGate are not peer-reviewed.
Yes, the journal Science is peer-reviewed.
No, not all journal articles are peer reviewed.
No, the content published on arXiv is not peer-reviewed.
No, the research published on bioRxiv is not peer reviewed.
LexisNexis itself is not a peer-reviewed publication; it is a database that provides access to a vast array of legal, news, and business information, including case law, statutes, and journal articles. However, some of the academic or legal articles found within the LexisNexis database may be peer-reviewed, depending on the original publication source. Users should check the specific source of each document to determine if it has undergone peer review.