This is called confirmation bias (see wiki/Confirmation_bias).
Yes, the tendency to ignore evidence that disproves ideas or beliefs is known as "confirmation bias." This cognitive bias leads individuals to favor information that supports their preexisting views while dismissing or rationalizing contradictory evidence. It can hinder critical thinking and impede objective decision-making, often resulting in a distorted understanding of reality.
skepticism
________ is defined as the tendency to doubt the validity of claims in the absence of evidenceAnswer this question…
Rational inertia is the tendency of individuals to maintain their beliefs or behaviors due to cognitive biases, even in the presence of contradictory evidence. On the other hand, linear inertia refers to the tendency of objects to maintain their state of motion unless acted upon by an external force, as described by Newton's First Law of Motion. The former is related to decision-making processes, while the latter is a concept in physics.
Yes, it does.
The perseverance effect refers to the tendency for beliefs to persist even after evidence discrediting them is presented. This can occur due to cognitive biases such as the confirmation bias, where people seek out or interpret information in a way that confirms their preexisting beliefs. In the context of the perseverance effect, the confirmation bias can reinforce and perpetuate false beliefs, leading individuals to ignore contradictory evidence.
confirmation bias
Mollification, a critical thinking error, refers to the tendency to downplay or ignore evidence that contradicts one's beliefs or opinions in order to maintain comfort or avoid cognitive dissonance. This can hinder objective evaluation of information and lead to biased reasoning. It is important to be aware of this tendency and actively seek out and consider alternative perspectives and information.
Confirmation Bias
Confirmation bias is the egocentric tendency that involves seeking out and interpreting information in a way that confirms our preexisting beliefs or values, while ignoring or discounting evidence that contradicts them. This bias can lead individuals to reinforce their existing beliefs rather than critically evaluating new information.
the tendency of a given item of evidence to prove or disprove one of the legal elements of the case
You might be looking for the phrase "exonerating evidence".