Because you are doing a HLP
Sialkot is very famous for making sport goods and gears (not only Football) Football industries are able to exploit workers doing many kind of hard, manual and less paid jobs in Sialkot. A job like sewing/stitching pieces of leather to make a ball are done even by child workers. Companies pay very little to them. This is a LIVING exploitation and it is not allowed by law in Pak/UNICEF/ILO etc.
There is work in towns and cities for them.
A system for holding workers to their jobs until debts were repaid
help me
Before the Atlanta agreement children could work and help their families by providing a source of income, however now they can't work in factories so it is, essentially, a loss for them as now their families will have less money to the little money they already have. But on the plus side they could get an education and get a better job. But for the most part it has affected their lives in a bad way. Hope this helped :)
They were escaping from the harrasment and discrimination they experienced.
So a boom town is created when a large amount of people move to a single location, often to exploit a natural resource. The gold rush is a good example. Then when the mineral or other reason to be there disappears so do the people. They leave behind the buildings creating a ghost town.
Company towns often exploited workers by tying their wages to inflated prices for goods and services provided by the company. This created a cycle of dependency, as employees found it difficult to save or invest in better living conditions. Additionally, the lack of competition limited workers' choices and stifled their economic mobility, leaving them vulnerable to the company’s control over their lives. Ultimately, this contributed to a sense of isolation and diminished workers' bargaining power.
Towns grew upas supply stationsfor railroad workers and travelers.
They could not leave their jobs until their debts were paid to the company
Critics referred to mining towns as examples of "wage slavery" because workers often faced harsh conditions, long hours, and low pay, which left them in a cycle of poverty and dependency. The term highlighted the lack of economic mobility and the exploitation inherent in the labor practices of the time, where workers had little choice but to accept unfavorable terms due to limited job opportunities. This situation was exacerbated by company towns that controlled not only employment but also housing and goods, trapping workers in a system that resembled servitude.
Residents of 'Okievilles' were called Okies. Okievilles were shanty towns built to house the throngs of migrant workers from Oklahoma.