Depending on school policy, the student or the institution may be the rightsholder of the paper. Either way, subsequent unauthorized reuse would be infringing, and passing it off as one's own would be plagiarizing.
Some photos on Flickr are copyrighted, others are not.
If its an offence to copy copyrighted products, it will be an offence to distribute them. You can be an accessory to the original offence.
We created a copyrighted report for a client. How do we prevent said client from our report and giving it to others?
To use others' copyrighted works, you need an exemption in the law (such as fair use) or permission from the copyright holder.
Yes, Edwin Landseer's works are copyrighted. He assigned the rights to his works to others prior to his death, and these people and their heirs have maintained the copyrights on his works.
If something is in the public domain, then it is not copyrighted. Creative commons also has a license for any software developer who wants to let others reuse their code.
The other people could have been the actual owner of the material and due to that it means they are allowed to upload there own work. However, others could have a licence to use the copyrighted material from the owner of the material. The others also may have found a way to classify it under fair use.
It can be. It can also be artworks, choreography, or architecture designed by others. It can also be any of these works created by you.
Many countries do not record operations, others do not allow public access to them therefore an accurate figure cannot be given.
Depression is a mental illness, therefore it cannot simply be passed on to others. There is not a single mental illness that is a communicable disease.
Because they are poor and therefore cannot partake in mildly expensive activities like the better half....I mean others in society.
You can copy, alter, distribute, and perform/display the work, or authorize others to do so.