0
What else can I help you with?
A physical test to determine guilt or innocence was known as a trial by?
A trial by fire.
How was a person's guilt or innocence determined in the 16th century?
Trial by combat was one method of determining a person's guilt or innocence. This practice allowed a duel to take place legally and fully sanctioned by the courts. The winner of the combat was declared to be the person who was right in the case.
Who developed the jury trial in which federal lords determined the guilt or innocence of an accused person?
The romans.
What is mean by expulcatory?
Exculpatory evidence at trial is evidence which helps to prove the innocence of the person on trial. The opposite word is inculpatory, evidence which proves his guilt.
What is the way of determining guilt or innocence in the midde ages?
In the Middle Ages, guilt or innocence was often determined through trial by combat, trial by ordeal, or trial by jury. Trial by combat involved the accused and the accuser fighting to prove innocence or guilt. Trial by ordeal involved subjecting the accused to a painful or dangerous physical test believed to be controlled by a higher power. Trial by jury involved a group of people deliberating and deciding on the guilt or innocence of the accused based on evidence presented.
Which house decides the guilt innocence of the president in an impeachment trial?
The Senate
What were the methods used to determine a person guilt or innocence?
In historical contexts, guilt or innocence were often determined through methods like trial by combat, trial by ordeal, or through the testimony of witnesses. These methods were largely based on superstition, belief in divine intervention, or physical strength. In modern times, guilt or innocence is typically determined through evidence presented in a court of law, including witness testimony, physical evidence, and expert analysis.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the middle ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages.?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
Can grand gury determine whether defendant in criminal case is guilty?
No, a Grand Jury determines whether there is probable cause, and if a prosecutor has enough evidence to bring the case to trial. A petit jury determines the guilt or innocence of a defendant.
What were two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the Early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
What were the two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early Middle Ages?
Two methods were: - trial by ordeal, in which the accused had to pass a dangerous test, like thrown into a well, and - trial by combat, in which he had to fight to prove his innocence. The two methods for deciding the guilt or innocence of accused criminals in the early middle ages were trial by combat or ordeal.
