0
What else can I help you with?
What is the relationship between the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and the exclusionary rule in criminal law?
The fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine and the exclusionary rule are related in criminal law. The doctrine states that evidence obtained illegally or through a violation of constitutional rights is considered tainted, like a poisoned tree, and any evidence derived from it is also tainted and inadmissible in court. The exclusionary rule is a legal principle that prohibits the use of illegally obtained evidence in court proceedings. Therefore, the exclusionary rule is often applied in cases where the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine is relevant, as it serves to exclude tainted evidence from being used against a defendant in a criminal trial.
Does the exclusionary rule apply to civil cases?
No, the exclusionary rule does not apply to civil cases. It is a legal principle that only applies to criminal cases, where evidence obtained in violation of a defendant's constitutional rights is excluded from being used in court.
Does the right to an attorney apply to all cases?
The right to an attorney does not apply to civil cases, but applies to all criminal cases.
What has the author Julian R Hanley written?
Julian R. Hanley has written: 'Introduction to criminal evidence and court procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Criminal Evidence 'Criminal justice processes and procedures' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Criminal justice, Administration of, Criminal law, Criminal procedure 'Selected cases for legal aspects of criminal evidence'
What has the author John Kaplan written?
John Kaplan has written: 'Criminal law' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal law 'Criminal justice: introductory cases and materials' -- subject(s): Administration of Criminal justice, Cases, Criminal justice, Administration of 'Marijuana, the new prohibition' -- subject(s): Drugs, Drug abuse, Law and legislation, Marijuana 'Basic materials on criminal evidence' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Evidence, Criminal 'The court-martial of the Kaohsiung defendants' -- subject(s): Politics and government, Riots, Trials (Riots), Courts-martial and courts of inquiry, Trials (Sedition), History 'The trial of Jack Ruby' 'Criminal law' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal law
What has the author Burr W Jones written?
Burr W. Jones has written: 'Jones on evidence, civil and criminal' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Evidence (Law) 'The law of evidence in civil cases' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), Civil procedure 'The law of evidence'
Criminal court proceedings?
Criminal court proceedings are conducted in a courthouse where evidence for and against the defendant is presented. The jury will make a decision and the judge will pass the verdict.
What has the author Stephen A Saltzburg written?
Stephen A. Saltzburg has written: 'Outline on attorney-client privilege' -- subject(s): Confidential communications, Lawyers, Attorney and client '1997 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure' 'August 1985 cumulative supplement to Federal rules of evidence manual' 'Washington evidence trial book' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law) 'Federal rules of evidence manual' -- subject(s): Evidence (Law), United States '1985 supplement to American criminal procedure' 'American criminal procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Cases 'Federal Rules of Evidence Manual February 1989 Cumulative Supplement' 'Federal rules of evidence manual' -- subject(s): United States, Evidence (Law) '1996 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure' '1984 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure, Cases and Commentary, 1984' 'Cases and Commentary, 1993 Supplement to American Criminal Procedure (American Casebook Ser.)' 'Trial tactics' -- subject(s): Trial practice 'The Federal Rules of Evidence Manual, February 1999 Cumulative Supplement' 'American criminal procedure' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Cases
What has the author Fred Edward Inbau written?
Fred Edward Inbau has written: 'Criminal law and its administration' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal procedure, Criminal law 'Criminal interrogation and confessions' -- subject(s): Police questioning, Confession (Law), Forensic psychology 'Scientific police investigation' -- subject(s): Criminal investigation 'Criminal law for the police' -- subject(s): Criminal procedure, Police, Handbooks, manuals, Criminal law 'Cases and comments on criminal justice' -- subject(s): Cases, Criminal procedure, Criminal law 'Self-incrimination' -- subject(s): Criminal Evidence, Criminal investigation, Criminals, Evidence, Criminal, Identification, United States
What happens to most criminal and civil cases?
Most criminal cases result in a plea bargain or trial verdict, while civil cases often settle out of court. Ultimately, the outcome depends on the available evidence, legal arguments, and decisions made by the parties involved.
What are the similarities between civil and criminal cases?
Both civil and criminal cases involve legal disputes that are resolved in a court of law. In both types of cases, there are parties involved who present evidence and arguments to support their positions. Additionally, both civil and criminal cases can result in a judgment or verdict that determines the outcome of the case.
Why do prosecutors sometimes choose not to prosecute criminal cases?
Prosecutors may choose not to prosecute criminal cases due to lack of evidence, witness credibility issues, prioritizing more serious cases, or considering alternative resolutions like diversion programs.
