In general, parents can be held liable for their children's intentional torts if they were negligent in supervising their child or if they contributed to the harm in some way. However, the extent of parental liability can vary depending on the circumstances and the laws of the specific jurisdiction.
i don't know ! haha
Torts and contracts are usually between individuals, and not the individual and state with reference to crime. Parties to a contract and torts are liable in case of a breach and the government is only liable when it comes to the laws that have been set up to govern torts and contracts.
It's a general legal principle everywhere that parents are held liable for the actions of their minor children.
An employer can be vicariously liable for the torts committed by an employee while they are in the scope of their employment in certain situations. An employer will not normally be held vicariously liable for the torts of an independent contractor because of a lack of supervisory control.
Vicarious liability or "respondeat superior."
There are three main types of torts: negligence, intentional torts, and strict liability torts. Negligence occurs when someone fails to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another person. Intentional torts involve deliberate actions that cause harm, such as assault or defamation. Strict liability torts apply when harm is caused by a particular activity or product, regardless of fault.
Parents should be interested in their childrens education so the children don't fail.
because parents are asses
Yes
No.
Parents teach their children on how to behave.
It depends on the age of the child. If they are minors, they shouldn't have debt, as they are unable to contract. If they are over 18, the debts are not the parent's responsibility unless the parents co-signed. The estate should be set up to resolve the debts.