no
Yes it is theft and they are liable for damages
Title holder is always liable.
You are liable for contractors employers since you are hiring them. However if you have a good contractor that have their own people then you should mentioned in contract that the contractor is liable for their own people.
Employers are NOT restricted in making factual comments on former employers. They are liable only if they make knowingly false statements. Prospective employers can ask about your former job, too.
Employers who carry WC can never be sued for employee injuries. Employers without WC are fully liable for employee injuries. Dancers get injured at work.
Texas is the only voluntary Comp state. But employers remain liable for the workers' injuries AND should opt out correctly - according to the state rules, filing their decision with the state and posting the proper notice to employees and to subcontractors who lack coverage. Why subcontractors who lack coverage? Because employers are liable to them too. Employers in all states need to realize they remain liable if they don't have coverage, that their employees and their employees' families can sue them - and in most states, subcontractors and their families can sue too.
the owner of the vehicle is always responceable in this situation..
yes. Always responsible.
If you were in the course and scope of your employment, the employers insurance would cover the damage, less any applicable deductile, assuming there is comp or collision coverage.
"Respondeat superior" is a legal doctrine that holds employers responsible for the actions of their employees performed within the scope of their employment. Essentially, employers are legally liable for the wrongful acts or negligence of their employees while on the job.
the employer is responsible to create and educate and monitor it's work force as to what sexual harassment is and where the line is crossed. There should be regular information in hand outs or on the bulletin board. It should be taught much like safety. alandw