Yes.
Everyone has the right to a fair trial. The prosecution has access to information, considering they are always in close contact with the police. The prosecutor's job is not only to prosecute the defendant, but to ensure that the defendant receives a fair trial in the court of law. Allowing the defense access to this information gives them the ability to provide an adequate defense to the charges being brought against them.
You and your attorney will have to produce enough evidence to counter the prosecutors evidence that it WAS you.
Discovery
Is the identification and continued safe possession of physical evidence from the moment it has been found to when it is accepted as evidence in court.
If the prosecutors have exculpatory evidence they must turn it over to the defense. Exculpatory evidence is evidence that shows that the defendant is not guilty or would help in his defense, A motion for exculpatory evidence is a defense motion asking the judge to order the prosecutors to turn such evidence over to the defense.
Generally, yes.
You can be charged with tampering with evidence if authorities believe you attempted to conceal, alter, or destroy evidence related to a crime, even if that evidence is not currently available or was never found. The charge is based on your actions or intent to interfere with an investigation, which can be inferred from circumstances or witness testimonies. Prosecutors must demonstrate that your actions were intended to obstruct justice, regardless of the actual existence of evidence.
The Code for Crown Prosecutors is a public document, issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions that sets out the general principles Crown Prosecutors should follow when they make decisions on cases. Is there enough evidence against the defendant?When deciding whether there is enough evidence to charge, Crown Prosecutors must consider whether evidence can be used in court and is reliable. Crown Prosecutors must be satisfied there is enough evidence to provide a "realistic prospect of conviction" against each defendant. Is it in the public interest for the CPS to bring the case to court? A prosecution will usually take place unless the public interest factors against prosecution clearly outweigh those in favour of prosecution
The opposite of defenders in a court are prosecutors. Prosecutors represent the state or government and are responsible for presenting evidence and arguments to prove that a defendant is guilty of a crime. While defenders advocate for the rights and legal interests of the accused, prosecutors seek to uphold the law and ensure justice is served.
No.
Prosecutors have a legal and ethical duty to disclose exculpatory information, which is evidence that may be favorable to the accused and could potentially exonerate them or mitigate their culpability. This obligation stems from the landmark Supreme Court case Brady v. Maryland, which established that withholding such information violates a defendant's right to a fair trial. Failure to disclose exculpatory evidence can lead to wrongful convictions and undermine the integrity of the judicial system. Thus, prosecutors must actively seek and disclose any evidence that could impact the outcome of a case.
Prosecutors may choose not to prosecute criminal cases due to lack of evidence, witness credibility issues, prioritizing more serious cases, or considering alternative resolutions like diversion programs.