No, though banning them is.
John Locke is an enlightenment thinker who supported religious tolerance and freedom of expression.
There are plenty of problems concerning freedom of speech and expression. When someone posts or says something that could lead to violence or hatred and subsequently the violation of someone else's rights it is illegal. Take the racial discrimination act in the UK for instance. Saying that you hate black people on the Internet could lead to some misinformed, already racist, uneducated or easily influenced people to act accordingly against black people. It's not just the political problems with freedom of expression. Freedom of expression also covers pornography. Complete freedom of expression would allow the publication of paedophilia, the abuse of woman and obsenity. Would you want your child to have free access to potentially emotionally scarring images and videos?
because i have freedom of speech i can be a part of a racist klan if i want to be. FREEDOM OF ASSEMBLY
Some people believe that using Native American imagery in sports and team mascots is racist and derogatory to Native Americans. Others do not agree and believe the use of Native American imagery is acceptable.
No, there is freedom of speech. Even if they say something racist that is not legal justification for assault, even if they had it coming.
yes but it is not illegal I suggest saying it to someone and seeing their expression
an individuals expression of racist attitudes or behaviors
unconstitutional racist violent evil inhumane rage stupid demeaning
it is based more on equality , but that didnt stop people from having slaves and being racist
It depends on how one uses the term "white racist". To some, white racist is someone who is white and they are also racist. To others, however, a white racist is someone who is racist exclusively towards white people.
No, Gandhi was not racist.
No he was not a racist.