Yes, we can still be guilty of plagiarism even if we paraphrase information if we do not properly credit the original source. Paraphrasing involves rewording someone else's ideas, but failing to acknowledge the source can mislead others into thinking those ideas are original. To avoid plagiarism, it's essential to provide appropriate citations for all sources, regardless of how much we change the wording.
Yes, even when you paraphrase information from a source, you should still cite it to give credit to the original author and avoid plagiarism.
Anytime you quote someone or paraphrase their ideas, you must cite the source. If you quote, it needs quote marks, even for a short phrase. If you paraphrase, you do not need quote marks.
Anytime you quote someone or paraphrase their ideas, you must cite the source. If you quote, it needs quote marks, even for a short phrase. If you paraphrase, you do not need quote marks.
Some people, who are called "sociopaths," never feel guilt at all. So, obviously, even if they are guilty and understand how others could think them guilty, they have no problem whatsoever about that living with themselves. Some people who are guilty may not understand that they are guilty. So they, too, have no problem living with themselves even if they are guilty because they do not understand themselves to be guilty. Some people manage to live with themselves even if they are guilty and understand that they are guilty. Often, they make their situation easier either by minimizing its importance or by thinking that others share the guilt. Furthermore, they may simply forgive themselves. After all, we all make mistakes. So it's possible to be guilty, accept one's responsibility, and still continue living.
Quotes come in handy when writing rhetorical essays. They provide evidence and support claims, usually in favor of your thesis. Paraphrase and summarize when you want to fit the source to your support your point, even when it supports the other side. Use paraphrases and summaries more when writing synthesis or argumentative essays.
Jurors don't "ACQUIT" people. Jurors can only find the Guilty or Not guilty.
If a juvenile offender is being asked to answer conviction questions, they are not required to say yes even if they are guilty. It is recommended that you contact an attorney for more information.
Unless the confession is to a crime that the jury does not think should be a crime, then they will return a verdict of "guilty". If they actually do dislike the law, they'll return a verdict of "not guilty", even though they know he/she technically is guilty.
Contact his or her supervisor. A LE officer should never give up information until a case is done then it's up to the courts to decide such outcome. Even if you are "no-brainer" guilty - the court system (and jury) decides your guilt or innocence, not a cop.
Enjoying something even though you know it's not good for you.
Sacco and Vanzetti Were the two Italian immigrants that were found guilty of murder and sentenced to death even though there was little evidence against them.
Im having the same situation please can I have an answer.