Yes, a judge can overrule another judge in a court case if they believe the previous judge made an error in their decision or ruling.
Yes, a judge has the authority to overrule a district attorney's decision in a legal case if they believe the decision is not supported by the law or the evidence presented in court.
Yes, in some cases, a judge can overrule a jury's decision in a court case. This is known as a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a directed verdict. The judge may do this if they believe the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial.
Yes, in some cases, a judge can overrule a jury decision in a court case. This is known as a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a judgment as a matter of law. The judge may do this if they believe the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial.
Yes, in a civil case, a judge can overrule a jury's decision if they believe the jury made a legal error or if the verdict is not supported by the evidence presented in the case.
A judge can overrule a jury when there is a legal error in the jury's decision or if the judge believes the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented in the case.
Yes, in some cases a judge can overrule a jury in a criminal case. This is known as a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and typically occurs when the judge believes the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented during the trial.
Yes, in some cases a judge can overrule a jury's guilty verdict in a criminal case through a process called a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) or a new trial.
It allowed the Supreme Court to overrule an unconstitutional law.
Yes, judges have the authority to overrule a jury's decision in certain circumstances, such as when the judge believes the jury's decision is not supported by the evidence presented in the case.
The judge in a Roman court case is called praetors (PREE-tuhrz).
They can overrule statutory law if they find it not in keeping with the Constitution or case law.
Yes, if he or she feels it is necessary and appropiate or maybe wishes to clarify or specify something. Of course, as long as he or she is well-informed about and/or is related to the case.