0
Can new evidence be introduced in a case after the initial trial has concluded, and if so, does the principle of double jeopardy apply in this situation?
Yes, new evidence can be introduced in a case after the initial trial has concluded through a process called a post-conviction relief. The principle of double jeopardy does not apply in this situation because it only prevents a person from being tried twice for the same offense based on the same facts.
What else can I help you with?
Who found the fallibility principle?
The fallibility principle was first introduced by philosopher Karl Popper. It posits that all knowledge is inherently conjectural and subject to revision based on new evidence or arguments.
Is it permissible to submit evidence after the discovery phase has concluded?
No, it is generally not permissible to submit evidence after the discovery phase has concluded in a legal proceeding.
Why can a trial be concluded?
A trial can be concluded once all evidence has been presented, witnesses have testified, and both the prosecution and defense have made their closing arguments. The judge or jury then deliberates on the evidence and decides on a verdict.
Which principle of accounting to answer accounting is based on tangible evidence?
the business entity principle
Is it permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial?
Yes, it is generally permissible for new evidence to be introduced during a trial, as long as it is relevant to the case and meets the rules of evidence.
What is a conclusion you can draw from the available evidence?
Based on the evidence provided, it can be concluded that there is a positive correlation between regular exercise and improved physical health.
If new evidence is found, does the principle of double jeopardy apply in the legal system?
No, the principle of double jeopardy does not apply if new evidence is found in the legal system.
What happens in a case where the prosecution lost criminal files or evidence?
Then that evidence can not be introduced in to court. They can not say "Well, we had evidence...".
The situation in which the evidence arises is called the?
The situation in which the evidence arises is called the context. It refers to the circumstances, environment, or background in which the evidence is found or observed. Understanding the context is crucial for interpreting the evidence accurately.
Who was responsible for defining the principle of cross transfer of evidence?
Edmond Locard, a French forensic scientist, is credited with defining the principle of cross-transfer of evidence, stating that when two objects come into contact, there is an exchange of materials between them. This principle forms the basis of trace evidence analysis in forensic science.
Who postulated the exchange of evidence principle?
The Exchange of Evidence Principle was postulated by Karl Popper, an Austrian-British philosopher of science. Popper's principle suggests that scientific theories should be testable and falsifiable through observation and experimentation.
What is the principle of charity?
In Debate, the principle of charity is to provide favorable interpretation of what someone has written or said that it is consistent with the evidence.
