Yes, voices can be copyrighted if they are recorded or fixed in a tangible form, such as in a recording or performance. This means that the specific expression of a voice can be protected under copyright law.
No a YouTube star called daneboe voices the Annoying Orange
Yes, voices can be copyrighted as a form of intellectual property. The regulations surrounding the copyright of voices vary by jurisdiction, but generally, the person who creates a unique voice recording or performance holds the copyright to that specific expression of their voice. This means that others cannot use that specific recording or performance without permission. However, copyright does not protect the sound of a person's natural speaking voice, only the specific recordings or performances that are fixed in a tangible form.
Only if the copyright is not part of the copyright registration that is copyrighted in the publication of the author's registration. But If the copyright is part of the copyright registration that is copyrighted in the publication then the copyrighted author of which publicized the copyrighted registration is not copyrighted in the legalized sense of which a publication is copyrighted. Yes, a work is always copyrighted, before and after editing and both versions.
Yes, Minecraft is copyrighted.
Yes Times is copyrighted
no brain-freeze is not copyrighted
it was copyrighted but it does not show on google.
RIMM is copyrighted.
The game itself is copyrighted. The stories and legends about him may not necessarily be copyrighted unless it was created in recent years.
Yes. It is considered art and can be copyrighted by the artist of the tattoo.
Not at all, the text is copyrighted as soon as it is written.
The quote has not been copyrighted by anyone.