Yes, a person can be arraigned without being arrested if they voluntarily appear in court to answer to criminal charges.
Not necessarily, you can be arrested before or after you are indicted. Either way, you cannot be arraigned until you have been taken into, or have surrendered to, custody
Such a person is known as an ARRESTEE until such time as they are arraigned in court then they become known as a DEFENDANT.
The law requires you to be arraigned within 72 hours of arrest
Because of Habeus Corpus, a person cannot be held in jail without a reason.
Arrested - Charged - Arraigned - Indicted - Tried - Imprisoned - or found not guilty and released
In Wichita, Kansas, if a person is not arraigned within 72 hours of their arrest, they may be entitled to release from custody. This is in accordance with the Kansas Constitution, which mandates that individuals arrested must be brought before a judge promptly. Failure to arraign within this timeframe could result in the dismissal of charges or the individual being released, depending on the circumstances of the case. However, legal outcomes can vary, so it's advisable for individuals to consult with an attorney for specific guidance.
Yes, he is arrested and in custody. He has not yet been arraigned; that has to wait until the Grand Jury makes its determination that a 'true bill' exists; that there is sufficient evidence to try him. After he is arraigned he will be tried, unless he pleads guilty. It seems unlikely that he will plead guilty. It also seems unlikely that he will be a free man any time soon.
You must be charged with something in order to be arraigned, and you must generally be presented to court to be arraigned within 24 hours of arrest. Of course, if you have already been charged with some offense but the police are still invistigating you on yet another, THAT charge can take as long as it takes them to produce probably cause.
Yes. If you are held but not put in a cell, you have still been arrested.
You can get bail only if you have been arrested and arraigned or the judge who issued the arrest warrant set bail when the warrant was issued (however, arrest is still a prerequisite for making bail).
Not in the United States. First you have to be charged, which at that point, you obviously know you are being charged. Then, arraigned, where you plead and request bail, which at that point, they may put you under house arrest. But my point is, you have to be charged and then arraigned to be placed under house arrest, so there is no way you would not know of this.
It makes no difference where you are arrested. You will be charged and arraigned for the new crime. Because of your status you will not be offered bail for the new offense, and the court will, in all probability, revoke your bond for the first offense and send you to jail.