No, in a mistrial, the evidence from the original trial cannot be used again. The case must be retried with new evidence and a new jury.
Yes, in a retrial after a mistrial has been declared, the same evidence can typically be used again. However, it is important to note that the circumstances of the mistrial and any legal rulings may impact the admissibility of evidence in the retrial.
Yes. Until you have been found guilty or not guilty, or the judge or attorney decides not to go any further with the case and drops it, you can be continuously retried. However, if your case goes outside the jurisdictions of the "speedy trial" laws of your state, you and your lawyer can petition the court on your behalf to drop it.
Yes. A mistrial means that the first trial never took place so double jeopardy is not an issue. It is only when a judge dismisses a case with prejudice or one is found not guilty in a trial that the defendant cannot be retried for the same crime.
No! Because in a mistrial, the defendant has been let go on extenuating evidence, and the trial will be heard at a later time with a new judge and new jury. If it even gets that far. In many mistrials the defendant goes free and the prosecution does have enough evidence to bring the defendant to another trial.---------------------ANOTHER VIEW: The above answer contains erroneous comments. The defendant in a mis-trial rarely goes free without being re-tried! If the case is assigned to that judge's docket he will retain control over it. There can be many reasons for a mistrial and most of them have nothing whatsoever to do with the judge or his actions. If neither the prosecution nor the defense files a motion for a new judge, or a change of venue, the odds are overhwelming that the same judge will re-hear the case.
When a mistrial occurs from prosecutorial error, usually the defendant is retried. In cases where the prosecution deliberately provokes a mistrial because the trial isn't going well and the defendant is likely to be acquitted, the Court will not allow the prosecution to potentially benefit from its misconduct through a retrial. If this happens, the charges against the defendant are generally dismissed.
No, a hung jury and a mistrial are not the same thing. A hung jury occurs when jurors cannot reach a unanimous decision, leading the court to declare a mistrial specifically due to the jury's inability to agree. A mistrial, on the other hand, can result from various factors, including procedural errors, juror misconduct, or external influences, not just a hung jury. In both cases, the trial is not concluded, and the case may be retried.
Unless there is a mistrial or a new trial is ordered after a conviction is appealed, there is only one trial per defendant per set of charges. An acquittal (finding of "not guilty") cannot be appealed. This is the same whether the trial is heard by a judge (a bench trial) or a jury.
If the judge declares a mis-trial (for whatever reason) it does NOT consititute double jeapordy to re-try you on the same charge.
An acquittal in a criminal trial means the defendant is found not guilty and cannot be retried for the same crime. A hung jury occurs when the jury cannot reach a unanimous decision, leading to a mistrial and the possibility of a retrial.
A jury in a trial makes the same decisions as a judge would in a bench trial. Based on evidence, they decide if a person charged is guilty or innocent.
Article VI of the Bill of Rights of the U.S Constitution states : "..nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb..". So basically the answer is no. The rule is called "double jeopardy".
A judge may cancel a trial prior to the return of a verdict; legal parlance designates this as a mistrial.A judge may declare a mistrial due to:The court determining that it lacks jurisdiction over a case,Evidence being admitted improperly,Misconduct by a party, juror,[1] or an outside actor, if it prevents due process,A hung jury which cannot reach a verdict with the required degree of unanimityDisqualification of a juror after the jury is impanelled, if no alternate juror is available and the litigants do not agree to proceed with the remaining jurors.A declaration of a mistrial generally means that a court must hold a retrial on the same subject.An important exception occurs in criminal cases in the United States. If the court erroneously declares a mistrial, or if prosecutorial misconduct forced the defendant into moving for a mistrial, the constitutional protection against double jeopardy bars any retrial