You need to provide more details.
In most jurisdictions you must perfect a claim of adverse possession by some sort of court decree. If you improved property that you didn't own then you were a volunteer and have no right to be compensated for the improvements. It sounds like you were dwelling in a house that was covered by a mortgage that has been foreclosed. If that is correct, the bank's interest is superior to yours. The owner of the property is responsible for any liens against the property.
That depends on who is responsible for the damage. If someone else was responsible then their insurance should cover your damaged property. If you are at fault then you will have to make a claim on a homeowner or renter's insurance policy of your own, if you have one.
Yes, a tenant can make improvements to leased property with the landlord's permission.
Yes, we can conduct a survey of your property to evaluate its current condition and identify potential improvements.
A tenant may be entitled to compensation for improvements made to a rental property if the improvements were approved by the landlord and added value to the property. However, the specific rights to compensation can vary depending on the terms of the lease agreement and local laws. It is important for tenants to document all improvements and discuss compensation with the landlord before making any changes to the property.
Yes, cost segregation laws can include improvements to real property. Improvements that are considered to be part of the building structure may be categorized differently than those that are considered personal property for the purpose of depreciation. It is important to consult with a tax professional to accurately classify improvements for cost segregation.
Upon the sale of a property, leasehold improvements typically remain with the property unless otherwise specified in the lease agreement or sale contract. The new owner usually inherits these improvements, which can add value to the property. However, the treatment of leasehold improvements can vary based on local laws and specific terms negotiated in the sale. If the seller has invested significantly in these improvements, they may negotiate for compensation or a reduction in the sale price to reflect their value.
If a person fails to obtain a deed to a property they claim under adverse possession, they do not gain legal ownership of the property. Their claim may lead to disputes with the true owner, who can assert their rights and reclaim possession. The claimant's investment or improvements made to the property may not be compensated, and they may have to vacate the property if the rightful owner enforces their rights. Ultimately, without a successful legal claim, the person retains no legal interest in the property.
You are responsible for the portion on your property and the other guy is responsible for the portion on their property.
The owner of the vacant lot is responsible for the $300 worth of damage. Liability does not depend on whether the lot has improvements or not.
At the end of a lease, any lesser improvements made to the property generally revert to the landlord unless otherwise specified in the lease agreement. The tenant may be required to remove any alterations or improvements they've made, restoring the property to its original condition. However, if the improvements are considered fixtures, they may remain with the property. The specific terms regarding improvements are usually outlined in the lease contract.
Rhapsody works with the performing rights societies to ensure songwriters and artists are appropriately compensated for use of their intellectual property.
No, because Leasehold Improvements revert to the lessor at the expiration of the lease term and a sign does not "improve" the leased property.