Can a judge rule on any part of a case after he has recused himself?

Which of the following is NOT part of a citation of a case?

The judge who heard the case.

Why did justice rehnquist recuse himself?

Justice William Rehnquist recused himself from several cases during his tenure on the Supreme Court due to potential conflicts of interest. One notable instance was in the case of Bush v. Gore (2000), where he had previously been involved in the 2000 Florida election recount as part of the legal team for the Republican Party. His decision to recuse himself helped maintain the integrity of the Court and avoid any appearance of bias in politically sensitive cases.

Has a US Supreme Court justice ever recused himself from a case?

Yes. US Supreme Court justices have recused themselves from cases many times across the history of the Court.Judges, justices and magistrates are required (or encouraged) under federal law to disqualify themselves from any case in which they may have a conflict of interest. Under 28 USC § 455:"Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned."The law cites such issues as personal bias or prejudice, personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts, cases in which the judge has previously served as an attorney, advisor, or witness for any of the parties, cases in which the judge has a significant financial interest in the outcome, personal relationships with parties to a case, etc.Supreme Court Justices are allowed discretion over which cases they hear and which they choose to recuse themselves from, which sometimes leads to tie votes or criticism that a participating justice was biased.In 2008, four justices (Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Kennedy, Breyer and Alito), recused themselves from considering a petition for certiorari in Isuzu Motors, Inc., v. Ntsebezadue to investments in some of the companies that were party to the suit. This left the Court without the required quorum to hear the case and resulted in automatic affirmation of the Second Circuit's decision.Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Alito had each disqualified themselves from earlier cases that resulted in tie votes, also leading to affirmation by an equally divided Court.New Justice Elena Kagan has identified at least eleven potential cases from which she would disqualify herself due to earlier involvement while serving as US Solicitor General. This number pales in comparison to the 75 cases from which Justice Thurgood Marshall disqualified himself.Some legal scholars have criticized Chief Justice John Marshall's decision not to disqualify himself from the US Supreme Court's seminal case Marbury v. Madison, (1803), despite having played a key role in the incident while serving as Secretary of State under President Adams. It should be noted, however, that the Court would have lacked a quorum if Marshall had recused himself, because two other justices, William Cushing and Alfred Moore, were unable to participate due to illness. (The Reporter of the Court from 1801-1806 noted that Marshall had recused himself from five cases during that period.)More recently, Justice Antonin Scalia was criticized for not disqualifying himself from Cheney v. US District Court,(2004), despite being a personal friend of Vice-President Dick Cheney. The Sierra Club filed a motion calling upon Justice Scalia to disqualify himself, to which Scalia responded with a 21-page answer defending his decision to hear the case.The answer stated, in part: "[a] rule that required Members of this Court to remove themselves from cases in which the official actions of friends were at issue would be utterly disabling."

What actors and actresses appeared in Serious Mixing Part 1 - 2003?

The cast of Serious Mixing Part 1 - 2003 includes: Judge Jules as himself Jason Kinch as himself Jonny Rose as himself Anne Savage as herself

Who plays the part of an adjudicator and administrator in a court case?

In a court case, the judge serves as both the adjudicator and administrator. The judge oversees the proceedings, ensures that the law is followed, makes rulings on legal issues, and ultimately decides the outcome of the case. Additionally, the judge manages courtroom procedures and maintains order during the trial.

Should word judge be capitilized in the middle of the sentence?

No, the word judge should not be capitalized in the middle of a sentence. This is, of course, if it is not the title of a specific judge.

The visiting judge in Ohio was dismissed for alleged corruption which was evident in your case Can you file a mistrial?

It would appear that if your case was a "Bench Trial" and you can prove malfeasance on the part of the judge you may have grounds to appeal your case.HOWEVER, if your case was tried by a jury and the jury found you guilty, You would have to show strong evidence that the judge swayed the trial and/or the jury's decision against you.

Do you and feel that a case attrition is a necessary part of the criminal justice system?

No because it is unconstitunial and many dont like it. If you are in a court case you shouldn't mention this as the judge will possibly deny it.

What does it mean when a judge rules against you on summary judgment?

When a judge rules against you on summary judgment, it means that the judge has determined there are no genuine disputes of material fact in the case and that the opposing party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This ruling effectively resolves the case or a significant part of it without proceeding to a full trial. It indicates that the evidence presented by the opposing party is sufficient to win the case, leaving you with limited options for appeal or further legal action.

Can guardianship judge issue Qualified Domestic Relations Order?

A QDRO must by issued by a court with jurisdiction to divide the parties' finances. Normally, a QDRO is ordered as part of a division of assets in a divorce case. If the guardianship judge has this authority, then yes.

What steps can be taken to initiate a motion to recuse a judge from hearing the matter?

To initiate a motion to recuse a judge from hearing a case, a party must typically file a written motion stating the reasons for the recusal request. This motion should be supported by specific facts or evidence showing bias or conflict of interest on the part of the judge. The decision to recuse the judge ultimately lies with the judge themselves or with a higher court if the judge refuses to recuse.

The judge's verdict was in favor of the what?

The judge's verdict was in favor of the plaintiff, ruling that the evidence presented demonstrated clear liability on the part of the defendant. This decision upheld the plaintiff's claims and awarded them damages for their losses. The ruling emphasized the importance of accountability and justice in the case.