In general, a judge can inform the jury about a defendant's prior convictions if they are relevant to the case, but this is typically limited to specific circumstances, such as when the defendant is testifying and their credibility is at issue. However, judges often exercise caution to prevent undue prejudice against the defendant, as older convictions may not accurately reflect current behavior. The rules governing this can vary by jurisdiction, so it's essential to consider local laws and court procedures. Ultimately, the judge's primary responsibility is to ensure a fair trial.
bench trial, where a judge will decide her guilt or innocence instead of a jury. By waiving her right to a jury trial, Jasmine is allowing the judge to hear the evidence and make a ruling based solely on the legal standards. This decision could be strategic, as bench trials may be perceived as less unpredictable than jury trials.
75 years old
can 10 yrs old request his last name changes
18- 20 after 21 your on your own
No because the judge will tell you that you need your parents help.
Jury duty is one of the ways that the Justice system remains fair and Unbiased. Defendants get the chance to chose between a jury trail or Judge alone in many places. The idea is that a group of normal people will reflect the morals and best parts of our society. This insures that a single person, be he a Judge or Jury member can't make an error and send a guilty person to jail. In reality it is much more complicated. There is a old old movie available called 12 angry men that illustrates rather well both the good and bad sides of this system. It is kind of boring by today's standards, but still illustrates the issues quite well.
In most states, a judge can make a "judgment notwithstanding the verdict" which sets aside the jury verdict. A judge can only set aside a jury verdict in limited circumstances, including irregularity in the proceedings, passion/prejudice, and a verdict that the evidence does not support. You should consult with an attorney if you are facing a motion to set aside a jury verdict and/or if the verdict has already been set aside.
Jury duty is one of the ways that the Justice system remains fair and Unbiased. Defendants get the chance to chose between a jury trail or Judge alone in many places. The idea is that a group of normal people will reflect the morals and best parts of our society. This insures that a single person, be he a Judge or Jury member can't make an error and send a guilty person to jail. In reality it is much more complicated. There is a old old movie available called 12 angry men that illustrates rather well both the good and bad sides of this system. It is kind of boring by today's standards, but still illustrates the issues quite well.
18
when your old enough to be able to walk into that court room and tell your feelings to the judge I know cause im going through the same thing
only to the judge in chambers. Will need to be examined for P.A.S.
I think it is 21