answersLogoWhite

0

People have been convicted without proper evidence. The accusation should be investigated; perhaps you did have a gun and fear a conviction based solely on her testimony. I don't know how to prove a negative (that you did not have a gun), but if you did there are other ways to show it besides her say so; other people saw it, there is other evidence of a gun in your possession like bullets or a gun box. This is why you need a lawyer.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why were the excursions of Sacco and Vanzetti controversial?

They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.


Why were executions of sacco and vanzetti controversil?

they were convicted of murder without hard evidence


Why were the executions of sacco and vanzetti controversial apex?

They were convicted of murder without hard evidence.


How can an accused find evidence from the DA without using discovery?

Ask the judge


Can you be convicted of robbery without evidence?

If the plaintiff cannot prove that the defendant commited theft, then the defendent is free to go. However, sometimes evidence is misinterpretted. Innocent people have been convicted at times.


Can someone be convicted based solely on testimony without any physical evidence or other corroborating proof?

Yes, someone can be convicted based solely on testimony without physical evidence or other corroborating proof. Testimony alone can be enough to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law, as long as the testimony is credible and persuasive to the jury or judge.


Which discovery could provide evidence against the theory of evolution?

A discovery that shows species appearing suddenly in the fossil record without any preceding ancestors would provide evidence against the theory of evolution. This would contradict the gradual changes in species predicted by evolution.


If caught driving without proof of insurance and convicted is this considered a misdemeanor?

If caught driving without proof of insurance and convicted is this considered a misdemeanor?


Who was the first person to be convicted of murder without the discovery of a body or murder weapon in Wisconsin?

== == I believe his name was Ron Rickman. Not sure on the spelling. I believe he did away with his wife, said she was on a shopping trip and never returned.


Can you try someone for murder if there is no body?

Several possibilities: (#1-and best of all) a confession by the perpetrator. Failing that; (#2) The defendant had a good motive and good circumstantial evidence can be proven. It is a bit unusual, BUT NOT A RARITY, for a defendant to be convicted in the absence of the victim's actual remains.


What is the duration of Without Evidence?

The duration of Without Evidence is 1.55 hours.


What discovery provided the evidence that Wengner was missing?

The discovery that provided evidence of Wengner's absence was the finding of his personal belongings, including his wallet and phone, at the scene where he was last seen. Additionally, surveillance footage showed him leaving a location without any indication of returning. These clues raised concerns about his well-being and suggested that he may have gone missing under suspicious circumstances.